this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
146 points (98.0% liked)

politics

29839 readers
3144 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It was a rare triumph for the democratic socialist candidate seeking to unseat the mayor of Minneapolis. After a chaotic party convention held last month, State Sen. Omar Fateh clinched the endorsement of the local Democratic Party, becoming the first mayoral candidate in the city to get that support since 2009.

But the edge was short-lived. On Thursday, Democratic Party officials in Minnesota took the rare step of withdrawing the Minneapolis chapter’s endorsement, citing “substantial failures” during the convention, which was marred by technological and procedural irregularities. It’s a blow for progressives in the city who championed Fateh’s victory and characterized it as a win for the Democratic Party’s left flank nationwide.

A draft report released by the committee notes the challengers to Fateh’s endorsement did not have to prove alleged violations, or system breakdowns, would have led to a different outcome for the challenges to be examined by the state party.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 54 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Democrats working against the interests of the people?? Say it aint so!

[–] arin@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Democrats don't want to win, they would rather have more Republicans than anyone against corporate donor interests.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

democrats are professional losers

[–] arin@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Their wallets don't lose tho. Fucking Nancy Pelosi insider trading forever

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 38 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Let's see, how can this be solved?

  • Go to the national DNC and demand they put him back.
  • Go to the Minnesota voters (they voted for him) and get them to pull their money out of the DNC locally.
  • Scream this at NY, they'll fight for you too.

This is a broken chapter and should be treated as such.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Minnesota voters didn't vote for him.

Minneapolis party delegates voted. But we'll never know how many voted for him, because 20% of the votes were left uncounted.

If this were any other election, there would be a unified call for a redo.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

Let's have a unified call for a redo.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Stop running as a Democrat. You can be mayor as a Democratic socialist and independent. Just look at Bernie Sanders.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s a real shame all these technical failures and procedural mistakes keep happening whenever a progressive wins in the party. I’m sure someone that givesomefucks will be around any minute to tell us all that the new DNC is all about undoing the wrongs of the past and that is why the top brass are such sticklers now.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

To be fair, the state party isn't the same thing as the national party. Heck, in Minnesota it doesn't even have the same name: it's officially the "Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party" because the Minnesota Democratic Party merged with the legitimately left-wing Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party back in the day.

'Course, that only means we should be even more disappointed in how they're acting now.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

Thats some Boeing merge with McDonell-Douglas shit going on. Let the rot in and it subsumes you inside out.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I wondered about that DFL part, and yeah misses the mark even more with that piece of history added.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

STOP THE COUNT! THE VOTE IS RIGGED! - Democrats whenever a progressive is about to win.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 12 points 9 months ago

Republicans: "Fucking starve for all I care."
Dem Soc: "Let's all work to make sure everyone eats."
Dems: "Here are some cake recipes."

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My hot take is that democratic socialism needs a rebrand.

Hell, the GOP rebranded fascism and autocracy as “MAGA.”

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

Not sure about that. DSA is taking off and becoming a household name. Zohran Mamdani broke the stigma on socialism. Affordable housing sounds so attractive even if you call it socialism people will not care anymore.

[–] Gowron_Howard@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

That tracks unfortunately

[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 7 points 9 months ago

Are we ready to accept the truth about US elections or nah?