Why would they even acknowledge her opinion to begin with?
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
29 points (96.8% liked)
news
579 readers
1142 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
Lots of people follow her and listen to her opinion. Commenting on this is like catastrophe control.
This is all NASA has time for when they're not groveling before Trump.
Hard to understand why she took six years to complete a 2 year law degree...
FYI, every month, we measure the distance of moon from earth with a laser reflected off the moon from a special mirror array. It was put there by BigFoot.
That might have been decent proof 60 years ago, but it would be almost trivial for a rover to set up a mirror now.
IMO, the best evidence for the Moon landing is the fact that the USSR didn't call bullshit.
They've been doing it since 1969 though. Sure, you can claim that it could easily be done with a rover, but back in 1969 there was no rover and the reflectors were still put up and could be tested by anyone who had access to the equipment required to aim a laser and detect the reflection. Granted that's not something Blue Collar Joe Schmoe would be able to do.
That's... Exactly the point of my comment?
Hard to understand
is it though?
Buzz Aldrin has entered the chat
I’d watch the shit out of Buzz clocking her dumb ass in the jaw like he did Sibrel in ‘02
Give him a bat.
Why does nasa have to stoop down to refute a Kardashian?