ShellMonkey

joined 3 months ago
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 29 points 6 hours ago

That too, just the fact that he said go for it instead of pulling every stunt possible to hide things is a fine start for me. As I recall it the impeachment was officially for lying about it to congress, but they would have taken any reason to cast stones at the guy.

Fun fact, despite the GOP claiming to be that party of fiscal responsibility, Clinton was the last president to actually have a balanced budget. Add in now that they're trying to use Clinton as a scapegoat while claiming 'part of morality' while the guy in office has been accused multiple times, caught on tape 'grab em by', and those are even before the current files.

It's almost like they've been talking out their ass for decades.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 91 points 8 hours ago (10 children)

Someone willing to put themselves up as a sacrifice to prevent the full collapse of the nation. If only it where more common.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 5 points 12 hours ago

Gee I guess we better toss a couple $100B more at the military...

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

1 usually with my cat sleeping between my legs

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fuck the DHS and this whole admin. Coal for all of you would be too nice.

At the end "please don't send me death threats" is a sad commentary on the level of lunacy in society today.

Ethics? Not familiar with the word...

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

...It’s unclear whether that report will be delayed since the records will be released on a rolling basis.

Oh, they will? That's already an accepted state we've decided on where they get to pick how and when they comply with a law?

Seems like it, will keep a watch at the rss for updates. I typically work more on the network side than software, but in this case just jumping 2 points was a no-go. It's all in the "easy way" from the docker setup so I'd guess the python 3.14 might have been the standard back in the 1.1.7 code?

In that case though there's active motion to move, and the ability to do so implies friction to push off against a surface. If he stood still then that same friction should carry him downstream.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I would have to assume move. Unless this ability could be material specific or be disabled at will, he would have to still be in contact with the surface because otherwise if he was actually levitating at some minor level he wouldn't be able to walk regardless of what he was standing on.

7
Upgrade Help? (piefed.socdojo.com)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com to c/piefed_help@piefed.social
 

Hey all, it seems I've not kept up on the instance updates and ran into a problem when looking to move several versions today. I'm currently sitting on 1.1.7, went through trying both the script and the manual steps (which look to be the same functionally) and get a consistent error every time at step 4/10

A couple things, is there a way I could set up an alert for version updates available to keep on top of things and more currently is there some steps I need to jump versions like this?

The relevant error in the build is below.

11.91 Collecting pillow-avif-plugin (from -r /tmp/requirements.txt (line 27))
11.92 Using cached pillow_avif_plugin-1.5.2.tar.gz (20 kB)
11.94 Installing build dependencies: started
14.31 Installing build dependencies: finished with status 'done'
14.31 Getting requirements to build wheel: started
15.96 Getting requirements to build wheel: finished with status 'error'
15.97 error: subprocess-exited-with-error
15.97
15.97 × Getting requirements to build wheel did not run successfully.
15.97 exit code: 1
15.97 > [21 lines of output]
15.97 Traceback (most recent call last):
15.97 File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pip/_vendor/pyproject_hooks/_in_process/_in_process.py", line 389, in
15.97 main()
15.97 ~~~~^^
15.97 File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pip/_vendor/pyproject_hooks/_in_process/_in_process.py", line 373, in main
15.97 json_out["return_val"] = hook(**hook_input["kwargs"])
15.97 ~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
15.97 File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pip/_vendor/pyproject_hooks/_in_process/_in_process.py", line 143, in get_requires_for_build_wheel
15.97 return hook(config_settings)
15.97 File "/tmp/pip-build-env-0ps7yuvt/overlay/lib/python3.14/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 331, in get_requires_for_build_wheel
15.97 return self._get_build_requires(config_settings, requirements=[])
15.97 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
15.97 File "/tmp/pip-build-env-0ps7yuvt/overlay/lib/python3.14/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 301, in _get_build_requires
15.97 self.run_setup()
15.97 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
15.97 File "/tmp/pip-build-env-0ps7yuvt/overlay/lib/python3.14/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 317, in run_setup
15.97 exec(code, locals())
15.97 ~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
15.97 File "", line 57, in
15.97 File "", line 17, in version
15.97 AttributeError: 'Constant' object has no attribute 's'
15.97 [end of output]
15.97
15.97 note: This error originates from a subprocess, and is likely not a problem with pip.
16.00 ERROR: Failed to build 'pillow-avif-plugin' when getting requirements to build wheel

[+] Running 0/2
Service web Building 18.5s Service celery Building 18.5s failed to solve: process "/bin/sh -c pip3 install -r /tmp/requirements.txt" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1

 

So I was just renewing a contract with a VPN provider, and paid out for a couple years it works out to somewhere under $2/month.

ISPs around me can run from about $50-$150/month

If I'm putting the major bulk of my traffic over a tunnel that could eat up a sizable chunk of a given connection point for the provider that I'm sure costs more than $2/month to maintain. I would have to assume it would take the combined subscriptions of several users to pay for a given node.

So how does that work as a business model? Unless these VPN providers are getting a steal on their connections it's hard to envision how they can manage to pay their costs without these nodes being absolutely bottlenecked when a few people start streaming some shows.

view more: next ›