this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
154 points (100.0% liked)

News

36457 readers
2496 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In addition to rising prices and tariffs, readers cite growing unemployment as a reason not to exchange gifts this year

Americans are feeling rattled about the state of the economy. Donald Trump has batted away question after question from reporters on concerns over higher prices, just a year after he won an election promising to bring down costs.

While the White House has tried to reduce concern, floating tariff-funded $2,000 stimulus checks and removing import levies on certain agricultural imports, many consumers remain anxious.

Preparing for the holiday season, and bracing for the spending it often demands, Guardian readers across the US expressed apprehension – and explained how they plan to spend – in this economy. Many said the higher cost of necessities, like groceries, was imposing on their ability to buy gifts for family and friends.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The wealthy already got their Christmas bonus from the US government months ago

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's what's funny to me.

MAGA people somehow think they are all playing on the same team but the rich don't give a shit about the US.

If the US went to shit tomorrow they would just wait it out on their yachts in the Mediterranean or buy themselves citizenship somewhere else.

The wealthy don't give a shit about your one horse town or flyover state. They would sell you out for a dollar if they could.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Nah it’s cool my $5k DOGE check is totally in the mail.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

The Felon in Chief can bluster all he likes. When people don't have the money to spend, they ain't gonna spend it.

This is also why the Trump administration is considering helicopter money checks. These types of hand-outs can give people a sense of having money. The problem is that it ultimately drives inflation. We saw this with the stimulus checks during the pandemic. Arguably, something was needed then to support people during an actual emergency. But part of the inflation problems we have now can be traced back to those checks.

"Tariff" checks may give a short boost to holiday buying. But the long term damage is not going to be worth it to anyone but Trump. And that assumes the short term benefits last through the 2026 midterms.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 11 points 3 months ago

Happy Buy Nothing Day! Week! Month! Starve the Beast! Only spend at local and small businesses.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 8 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I’m not buying shit this year. I’m saving up for emigration fees, and moving expenses.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

But we’re the HOTTEST COUNTRY IN A VERY LONG PERIOD OF TIME, MANY PEOPLE SAY HOTTEST COUNTRY IN HISTORY

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

Being unemployed is very high the list of why I cut back, and my unemployment is directly caused by the Trump administration. Nearly everybody I know that is fully employed, across all kinds of different careers and industries, has had cutbacks/layoffs at work with threat of more to come, so they're all very cautious about spending in general (not just holidays). Even self-employed folks in what are typically solid trades seem to be struggling more than I would have expected.

Personally, I've decided I'm not traveling to see family this year and I'm not buying any gifts, aside from a few toys for younger relatives. Since I don't know how much longer I'll be unemployed or if I'll be able to find something with comparable pay and benefits to what I had, it doesn't make sense to spend on gas, vehicle maintenance, stamps, etc for the foreseeable future.

As an aside, I ended up at Walmart this morning on Black Friday, though I wasn't going for any of the sales stuff. I was dreading it. While I'm sure it was busier than a typical Friday morning, it was an "I've seen it busier on a random Tuesday night in April" kind of situation. I know that the situation at one Walmart I was in for 30 minutes or less on Black Friday doesn't count for squat and there are a plethora of reasonable explanations as to why it didn't seem particularly busy, but it does fit suspiciously into the general theme of a struggling economy with lots more people than normal cutting back due to concerns about their economic outlook. It will be interesting to see the official data, though with this administration it's not like that will be particularly accurate or trustworthy.

Funny enough, on the way to the store I had a flashback to the days leading up to the 2024 election when the super basic yard signs were all over the place around here with slogans like "Trump low prices, Kamala high prices". Of course, I knew it was absurd even back then, but now it just seems all the more ridiculous as I look back through my grocery expenditures and realize that even with all the cutbacks I've made this year, I'm still spending more while getting a lot less.