371
submitted 11 months ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

SO. MUCH. THIS.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Krzak@discuss.online 61 points 11 months ago

Ok but first manufacturers must "rethink" planned obsolescence and right to repair

[-] chic_luke@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I agree. I'm tired of always blaming the end users for everything

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago

maybe it's my personality or i'm old but i keep my things (including tech) until they become unusable. i've never thought about upgrading my phone every couple of years. i kept my last phone for 6 years (it became a brick), my current phone is from 2018.

[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago

I intentionally buy things that I know I can use until they are unusable. I do not often buy anything from apple.

[-] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Me too. My phone is 10 years old, my microwave is 40 yrs old, my car is 24, my home theater amp is 25.

I take pride in taking care of my stuff and making it last as long as possible. It's something I got from my grandmother who wouldn't let anything go to waste. (She was a refugee from ww2, so she knew a thing or two about making things last and making due.) Obviously not everything can last that long, but if you get good quality things chances are it'll be around a lot longer than if you just buy cheap or flashy stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 39 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Legalize Right To Repair Ban Planned Obsolescence

Boom, solved the problem. But once again it's easier to shame Joe Q. Public than hold the real criminals accountable.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Won't solve the problem of people spending 1000+ dollars a year on the latest and newest because they need it as a status symbol to fill the vacuous hole where a personality would be.

and I'd wager more people are buying new phones every year for that reason, than due to forced obsolescence.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

Ban glue in non-waterproof electronics. I remember when I didn't need to risk destroying a device with a heat-gun to open it up and repair it like 10 years ago, but y'know, everything needed to be thinner.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Thats one thing that boggles me.. I've never heard a single person go "Y'know, this phone is nice..but I wish it was thinner and more fragile".

I'm convinced they just want to make phones thinner, and push screens further to the edge (or in the case of Galaxy, around the edge and down the side) just to make them more likely to break when dropped.

[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

You're on Lemmy. That means you're probably not a "form over function" shopper, y'know?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dremor@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

In waterproof ones too. It isn't hard to make use of stainless steel screws and a simple O-Ring (see computer waterblocks).

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Reminder that industrial handheld computers, despite being way more water and everything else resistant than an iPhone will ever be, and whose environmental resistance is absolutely critical to their function and not just a marketing bullet point, are also repairable and upgradable. They work for decades with periodic maintainance which is actually why heavy industry seems so "behind the times" on upgrading their equipment, they simply don't have to because their existing gear is so resilient.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] somenonewho@feddit.de 36 points 11 months ago

Smartphones have been "good enough" for a while now. Enough power and battery to do all the things needed for enough time before running out of battery.

IMHO there are 2 reasons we still regularly upgrade.

  1. "Obsolescence" wether it would be perceived new hardware features or just new software not being available
  2. Use/breakage (I include batteries dying in that) with no reasonable way to replace parts

I've had a few phones over the years some of them I "legitimately" just broke (one had a cracked mb after a bike accident) I broke my second to last phone trying to replace the battery (thought I would be able to, broke the screen). The fact that everything is glued down and made to not be replaceable irked me so much that my current phone is a Fairphone. Replacing the battery takes 1 minute and requires no tools. Replacing the screen takes like 5 min and 8 screws. I plan on using this phone for at least 5 years more if possible. But I understand not everybody can shell out 600 dollars for an "OK" phone.

[-] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee 25 points 11 months ago

It’s good practice to buy at least one or two new smartphones per year.

[-] Rubanski@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago

Thank you for the tip, Mr Business Man!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 21 points 11 months ago

Reduce. Repair. Recycle.

Most phones, break this at every step.

[-] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A big part of it is built in batteries that are difficult to replace. My phone has a removable battery and is on its third one now... still works fine and does everything I want it to, after 10 years of use.

Edit: It's running Lineage Os 18 (android 11) not the original android 5(?) it came with, so security updates are not an issue.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Sure, let's blame consumer for corporate policies

[-] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

It's both really. Too many people rock a cracked screen, then upgrade it as soon as they can. Rather than looking after their device or getting it repaired.

But at the same time, corporations limit device longevity due to bad practices. Like limited security updates, planned obsolescence and anti-repair policies.

In short, not enough people care enough, and the companies prey on this. Attacking the "upgrade culture" is valuable, as legislating against these bad practices can only happen if the people exert enough political pressure

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yoz@aussie.zone 19 points 11 months ago

At work my manager still rocks an old Motorola g5 plus. He says phones have reached peak performance and there's no point of upgrading. Hes a humble, down to earth guy also make $210k/ year.

[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

The problem is that there are security updates that those old phones need and aren't getting. The whole "let's tie the operating system binaries to the hardware" thing was always dumb, somehow Windows can handle binary-blob drivers that aren't built into the OS.

[-] stefenauris@pawb.social 5 points 11 months ago

Oh I loved that phone! I still have it but I didn't have the balls to replace the built in battery so I reluctantly decided to upgrade

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] blueeggsandyam@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Phones have to easily repairable before you can blame consumers for upgrading. Cell phones are pretty essential for modern life and most of us don’t want to be without them for long. The upgrade allows for people to not have to worry about what to do when something out of warranty breaks. It is like fixing your car. In warranty, the manufacturer or dealer takes care of things. Out of warranty, you have to find a repair shop. Finding a repair shop is difficult. Trying to get a second or third quote on a broken car is difficult and costly.

The alternative is to make repair shops have transparent prices and make it easy for them to get oem parts. The other option is to force companies to warranty their phones for longer. Until the government does one of those you can’t blame consumers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] obinice@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Dawg, I only upgrade phones and laptops once every 8 years or so. These things are EXPENSIVE, I can't afford one more often than that.

My current tablet came out in 2014, that's when I got it. It'll be a decade old in just a few months.

Besides swapping the battery out twice over the years, it still works great and does everything I need it to do. Fantastic big AMOLED display, too.

[-] June@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

Yea, idk, I’m upgrading my phone after 3 years, and if this buyer comes through I’ll have paid $100 for that 3 years of use.

I think a lot of people treat the idea of upgrading often as the old become ewaste immediately or is just kept in a drawer. But selling my used gear while it still has value keeps my overall burden down and devices much cheaper. I upgraded to the Pro Max this year, and out of pocket after this sale I’m spending $350. If I had had the Pro Max before I’d probably be getting another $100 or so for my used device. I’ll do the same thing in 3 - 5 years depending on if/when I have an incentive to upgrade again.

Laptops and tablets are a different story since they don’t keep their value quite as well as iPhones do, and if I’m honest have a much smaller impact on my daily life.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I dunno, my phone's always start to have issues if I keep them too long. Boot loops, frequent crashing, random resets, functionality failing to work as it did when new, lack of security updates, etc. The hardware is built to fail

[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.procrastinati.org 9 points 11 months ago

...no longer receiving updates.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 14 points 11 months ago

I keep seeing the complaints, but do enough people actually upgrade yearly? Because anecdotally (including online communities in this) I have seen most people claim that they only upgrade every 3-5 years and I think that's sensible as an upgrade cycle and will only get longer now if my own feelings match the general populace.

I personally have found myself needing an upgrade every 3 years on average and think I'll find a way to go longer with phones which don't lose security updates around the exact time the battery starts swelling on my old phone (my previous reason for upgrading and seems to be happening again)

[-] gamer@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

In the US at least, I think most people get their phones through their carrier and are stuck on a contract paying it off for ~3 years. I think rich people and enthusiasts/fanboys are the only ones who upgrade every year or buy it unlocked at full price from the manufacturer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] skip0110@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

It’s impossible if the vendors stop shipping os updates. I can’t use an out of date phone for my works 2fa push. Kept my phone for 5 years and it was still going, but the planned obsolescence got me.

[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I would probably still be using my Pixel 2XL if the battery didn't die. Or a Nexus 6P if that didn't die from the hardware defect they got sued for. Probably even the OnePlus One before that too, but that may be a bit old for daily use

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LoganNineFingers@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

Have a Note 10+

Screen needs replacing : $450 + tax (cdn) Only one more year of security updates

Bought a "renewed" s23 for $700. I didn't want to but it didn't make sense to sink so much into the old phone even though it worked fine. It pained me to give up the SD card slot...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

If only new batteries were easily swappable...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] calavera@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Just don't buy a fucking new phone every couple years

[-] nostradiel@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago
[-] Swim@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

problem is planned obselescence.. dont buy it? fine.. a few more years we will do it for you to by dropping support for the one you are using

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 8 points 11 months ago

Batteries are the biggest culprit for this even beyond software support. They degrade predictably over time... thus they are disposable. But with no way to replace them on most phones that means the entire device is disposable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] weedazz@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Bold of you to assume I don't lose or break my phone every year or two

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Yep. When you can’t easily replace a battery it’s a strong (intentional?) disincentive by the manufacturer that pushes people towards buying a new phone. If you need to surrender your phone for a day or three to get the replacement done, people would rather sign a new contract for a phone than be without.

[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

gosh, I love my Fairphone.

[-] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

First and foremost, don't feel pressured to get a new hand tablet with a ten-lense DSLR stapled to the front every single year.

I know Straits only used a picture of an iPhone to get more clicks, but Apple is the least of the offenders when it comes to this. iOS 17 runs on phones released six years ago (including the last iPod touch!), and security updates go a couple years further back than that. I wish Android phones could guarantee that kind of lifespan.

Battery replacement sucks on every smartphone except for obscure modular phones that suddenly lose support or the company goes out of business. But the newest iPhone actually makes it easier to replace the battery (read: still sucks a bit). So, while you have to jump through hoops, you can replace the battery on every smartphone (usually through official channels, but also by other means if needed).

What needs to happen is the masses need to be taught that it's okay to keep your phone for a few years. Phones need to regarded like cars. Drive it until you can't, THEN get a new car. And when you do, consider a newer used car. Once that becomes commonplace, then companies will be forced to tone down their release schedules.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
371 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

57944 readers
2982 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS