this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
202 points (99.5% liked)

movies

2323 readers
165 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Raising a big eyebrow at the prospect of mega-corporate consolidation of movie theater venues collapsing in the face of mega-corporate consolidation of movie production companies.

I think it should say something that you can stream a thousand different movies at home for $20/mo, but you can't license a movie for public viewing at less than $300/day. The real big blockbusters can demand north of $2000/day, then demand 50% of the ticket price on top of the licensing fee. If you're wondering why you can't get into a theater for less than $20/ticket or why the old 3-5 screen cinemas all died out a decade ago, this is why.

It almost makes me wonder at the prospect of fully off-book unlicensed movie houses. How gangster to set up shop in an abandoned mall and host one-night screenings of pirated films on high end portable projectors? Maybe this already exists and I just don't know about it.

[–] e0qdk@reddthat.com 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It almost makes me wonder at the prospect of fully off-book unlicensed movie houses. How gangster to set up shop in an abandoned mall and host one-night screenings of pirated films on high end portable projectors? Maybe this already exists and I just don't know about it.

Students at my high school were doing that (with the science classrooms rather than in an abandoned mall) like ~20 years ago. They were watching fansubbed anime though, not Hollywood movies.

[–] skribe@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We were doing it in the late 80s at university. Showing a bunch of SF/F movies in a lecture hall on the weekend for five bucks. We made an absolute killing on the drinks and snacks, which we used to buy books for the SF/F club library.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

It’s already crumbled.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago

Wait, are you telling me the billionaires who own the theatres and the billionaires who own the movie production companies were too stupid to figure out a path forward so both their industries didn't collapse?? Color me surprised...

[–] ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl 11 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Good. I took my wife and kid to a movie the other night and spent $150 for stale popcorn, shitty candy and a few sodas plus movie tickets. "nO oNE gOEs tO MOVie tHeATrEs ANyMoRE!!!!"

Yeah no shit I wonder why?

[–] Steve@communick.news 10 points 2 weeks ago

You need a better theater.

And you realise you chose to buy that stuff, right?
Do you need popcorn and candy?
When I was growing up, and even into adult hood, never bought theater food. Not until I found a theater that has real meals and and their own craft beers.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I called bullshit that you got stale popcorn. Considering how fast movie theaters go through popcorn. And if you're spending $150 then you're doing something wrong. I mean that means that you spent about 50 bucks per person since it was only three of you. I see in another comment that you mentioned it was $32 each for movie tickets and you're in New york. I mean that's simply the case here is that you live someplace that's very expensive to do anything. And you chose to go to a movie theater that charges quite a bit. You could simply do something like a movie club like Cinemark or AMC's movie club or something like that which is a whole lot less per month you get free movie tickets and you get discounts on everything. I go to the movies three or four times a month and even with a family of four I typically won't spend more than $100 in my area. And that's usually buying the most expensive tickets as well which are usually like IMAX and d-box tickets etc.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm genuinely dumbfounded that you even managed to spend that much at the movies.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Its $10 for a damn soda, and has been for 20+ years (which is about when I stopped going to the theater for the most part).

Eaay to do with 4 people. I have no idea what tickets cost these days.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

Y'all don't sneak in snacks? It's cold out and it's easy to sneak in soda bottles in a jacket. I snuck in a KFC meal in my jacket to watch Avengers Endgame.

[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Rookie mistake. The movies are still pretty affordable if you plan it right. Go to a matinee or special pricing days. Smuggle in your snacks and drinks. Hell, I've walked in with a whole ass fast food meal before.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

The rectum can hold a surprising amount of food if buttered.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Isn't cinema already experiencing agonal breathing?

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Now you know how we all feel about the impending AI unemployability apocalypse.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We’ve apparently decided that gambling is completely legal in the US again so why not take it a step further and turn all the dying theaters into brothels? They already have lots of individual soundproof rooms and snacks for when you need more energy.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

gambling is completely legal in the US again

Yeah that kind of just happened, didn't it?

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

gambling

brothels

I don't know sort of gambling you're into, but I'm curious to find out.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'll start my own movie theater, with blackjack and hookers! In fact, screw the movie theater.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

People still go to the movies?

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah! I try to hit at least two a month!

If you can afford it, a lot of the theater chains have "clubs" where for a (imo) reasonable subscription price you get free tickets and discounted concessions. My partner and I spend $20 each on our subscriptions which is why we try to see at least two movies a month, combined with the discount on concessions we break even that way.

Through regal, idk about the other ones, there is also a reward system which I use for free concessions and free "premium" tickets (imax, 4d, etc)

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

if you're breaking even on the subscription + discount concessions, wouldn't it be more cost effective to not subscribe and not feel obligated to go to the movie if you don't or can't want to? Also are you limited to 2 free movies a month or could you go more if you wanted to?

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I could go as many times as I want, some months I'll go 5 or 6 times. I few films this year I saw twice because they were that good.

I personally actually like feeling like there is an obligation to break even, as it encourages me to see things I normally wouldn't. I wouldn't have gone to see Bugonia if i had to pay for a ticket, but I had a free afternoon and a free ticket so I saw it. I enjoyed myself more than I would have if I'd paid for the ticket.

That's kind of where I stand with it, if not for the subscription I'd never feel like I could afford to go see some trash I'm pretty sure will be terrible just for the hell of it.

I like movies 😊

To be clear, I am aware it isnt a particularly good deal unless you were already seeing more than 2 movies a month.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago

That's awesome, thanks for explaining.

[–] anticonnor@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I do, but mainly stick to the 2nd run theaters that play older movies. Last movie I saw in a theater was Carpenter’s The Thing a couple weeks ago.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

I recently started going a little bit more, because a new one with certified IMAX (but not the biggest screen) popped up around 25 mins from home. It’s technically in another (smaller) city and for some reason not a lot of people know it exists so it’s never full and still very clean. The IMAX tickets on discount Tuesdays are $5, so we try to go to matinee screenings on those days. There’s usually fewer than 10 people whenever we go and there have been times where we had the entire theater to ourselves.

I would otherwise never go if my only options are the AMCs, Cinemarks, and Regals in my area. The only other theater I go to is the stand-alone huge true IMAX cinema that I’m lucky to have in my city, but only for special movies.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Rarely, because there are very few movies that are worth going to a theater to see instead of just waiting for it to come to streaming.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, there's a Europa Cinemas network with theaters in bigger cities. They show good movies from all over the worlds. The tickets cost 6€. I visit mine from time to time. I saw really nice Mongolian movie not so long ago.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

whole system crumbles

Hey, they're starting to catch on.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

a lot of people dont' even watch movies anymore.

i have been told may times from people the past few years a 90m movie is 'too long' for their attention span. tiktok brain. at best the can do 20m sitcoms where they don't really have to pay attention to get the jokes.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is a very narrow view. Between work, commuting, and general life maintenance it can be tough to actually commit 2+ hours to a film, uninterrupted. Tv shows, even long form/miniseries stuff, are just easier to slot. It's no different from scheduling a meeting at work: scheduling a 150 minute session is something you have to plan weeks in advance, you can get 30 minutes free tomorrow.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

a movie isn't a commitment. it's entertainment. it's not studying for a class.

you can also... pause it and come back later.

where do you work that you have 150minute meetings? that sounds insane.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's not frequent but sometimes you need to design things or make plans which you then break out into smaller sessions.

As for the rest, some people don't have the same relationship with entertainment you do. I don't like to split movies, their whole shtick is being consumed in one sitting. I probably watch more on airplanes than at home.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Where do you get those 90m movies? Most of the stuff I see is 120+? I yearn for shorter movies (70-80 has always been my favourite sweet spot)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

By the end of four years. Our country will be in ruins. Good job MAGAts.

[–] LifeLikeLady@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The best movie I've seen in theaters for the last 5+ years... Was Kill Bill and Kill Bill 2 special event screening last friday.

It's pretty sad that a 21 year old movie is WAY better than anything else I've seen in years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Boo hoo. Every system is crumbling. Join the club

[–] BobQuasit@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

If I owned movie theaters, I'd start making my own movies. Hollywood is a dying star, heading towards black hole status.

And at this point, a drooling idiot could make better movies than Disney or most of Hollywood. Always excepting Guillermo del Toro, of course! He's amazing.

[–] lemmie689 2 points 2 weeks ago

Lose myself inside your schemes
Go for the money, honey
Not the screen
Be a movie star, blah blah blah
Go the whole hog
Be bigger than God

Burn Hollywood burn, taking down Tinseltown
Burn Hollywood burn, burn down to the ground

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

In my country cinemas are already getting closed, because not enough people go. The only time I've seen more than half of the seats filled was the Revenge of the Sith 20th anniversary rerun earlier this year. And even then it wasn't even close to full. Looks like a finished business.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›