this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
624 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

28154 readers
1150 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
624
GDPR Wrapped (piefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com)
 
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 110 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] generic_computers@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

"whet got up to"

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 94 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Oh god, uBlock or privacy badger needs to do this

[–] MSBBritain@lemmy.world 80 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

While funny, the whole idea of tracking your data enough to give you a wrapped kind of goes completely against everything these extensions are supposed to do.

My suggested alternative is you click the wrapped button and it just says:

"Fucked if I know! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯"

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It could keep a local count, wouldn’t need to communicate it out. It basically already shows you how many things are getting blocked, it would just be a funny end of year easter egg

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah a local record of blocked ads would be trivial to save and no need to upload.

[–] eatham@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

It already shows how many ads have been blocked.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 9 points 2 weeks ago

"who cares, fuck em"

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Well. uBlock does track total blocks

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 weeks ago

But it does say right on that page:

Take note that the network request logger in uBO is a forward-looking logger: this means only future requests can be logged.

In the spirit of efficiency, uBO will log entries IF AND ONLY IF the logger is opened. Otherwise, if the logger is not opened, no CPU/memory resources are consumed by uBO for logging purpose.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Or it could just be made up static data

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 20 points 2 weeks ago

https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam is the closest to this that I know of

[–] ArchEngel@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

That would legit get me to pay them or donate or something. Such a hilarious idea.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 9 points 2 weeks ago

I totally want a uBO version of that

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Advanced Privacy" app on /e/-os (opensource android ROM) sends me occasional notifications about apps with most trackers haha. Also has a "wall of shame" (it's literally called that) where you can browse the worst offending apps

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 46 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You clicked "Accept all" ONCE in a real hurry, huh?

This used to give me nightmares. Then I learned to love the bomb: Clean out everything each time you close your browser.

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

And all that's left is your fully trackable browser fingerprint.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] smeg@feddit.uk 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So if I'm identified as unique how bad is that? Is fingerprinting so critical that it makes all my other attempts at privacy pointless, or is it a niche edge-case that you don't really need to worry about?

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I do not think ads would keep tracking you though browser fingerprinting. Maybe just a little.

But, say, you are being prosecuted and your traffic is being looked at. No one can defend you if a fingerprint of your browser shows up somewhere where it shoulnd't have been. You being a unique one with this fingerprint means that nobody but your machine accessed that IP address.

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Would a fingerprint uniqueness hold up in court?

It kinda feels like saying: "we know the crime was committed by someone who's this tall with this hair color and this skin color and has this tattoo on the right arm and who speaks these three languages and we have never seen anyone else who matches all of those things so it must be you"

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If it points to your IP but not your PC - probably won't hold. Same if IP is wrong but fingerprint is fine. But if both are matching, there is no doubt. You know, not many Windows 11 Pro Laptops with intel 125H, 4060m, 1440p 144hz screen, Firefox version, exact same font list, system language, setting preferences exist on the planet. It is a fingerprint in the similar way an actual fingerprint works.

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh right I hadn't thought of combining it with the IP itself.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, so e.g. you open site A without a VPN and then later, site B with a VPN on the same browser.
Your browser is now recognised and site B may sell you ads based on what you did on site A, or maybe region-block you based on your IP with site A.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

The things that give it off (i.e. 0.00%):

  • List of fonts (JS)
    • I think this should be an easy fix. Just provide some, widely-used fonts to the browser and not all the 200 fonts that are on the system
  • HTML5 Canvas
    • I have no idea what this is based on, but shouldn't it be possible to randomise it every time, so that even though it is unique every time, it is so for everyone and every time they refresh the page?
  • Audio data (sometimes)
    • happened in LibreWolf, but not in Firefox
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

Sure, it's still better to NOT click Accept all once in a hurry.

But my browser does mitigate some of that.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How much does privacy badger help with that

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago

data shared with 17203 partners

Only 17203? I feel like that's low

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Is this that metadata I hear so much about /s

[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago

I wonder what the 2025 version will be ;)

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

The "Login teminder popup remover" userscript works well for me. Additionally to an adblocker of course.