this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
51 points (100.0% liked)

World News

51431 readers
2185 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Two NATO-nation intelligence services suspect Russia is developing a new anti-satellite weapon to target Elon Musk’s Starlink constellation with destructive orbiting clouds of shrapnel, with the aim of reining in Western space superiority that has helped Ukraine on the battlefield.

Intelligence findings seen by The Associated Press say the so-called “zone-effect” weapon would seek to flood Starlink orbits with hundreds of thousands of high-density pellets, potentially disabling multiple satellites at once but also risking catastrophic collateral damage to other orbiting systems.

Analysts who haven’t seen the findings say they doubt such a weapon could work without causing uncontrollable chaos in space for companies and countries, including Russia and its ally China, that rely on thousands of orbiting satellites for communications, defense and other vital needs.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 days ago

Musk is their ally too so I doubt it

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

new anti-satellite weapon to target Elon Musk’s Starlink constellation with destructive orbiting clouds of shrapnel

  1. That's what Starlink satellites will become on their own.

  2. The trash cloud won't go away, it'll stay up there destroying future satellites as well.

We could very well permanently fuck ourselves over with this, and arguably already have. Because the people putting satellites up are just worried about short term profits and nothing more than a decade from now.

[–] Calabast@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

All Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, including Starlinks, are in orbits that naturally degrade due to atmospheric drag. They require regular boosts to stay in orbit and will naturally de-orbit and burn up in the atmosphere at end-of-life. Look I hate corps and Musk as much as all of us, but let's at least get the facts right.

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If the satellites are destructively attacked this could change. Debris could be thrown to unpredictable orbits, which could destroy other sattelites, and get the ball rolling on Kessler syndrome.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

LEO is like…. 1/10th of actual orbit… there’s zero chance that happens.

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're probably right, but I'd really like to not have anything blown up in orbit.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More worried about the tons of shrapnel falling down to earth and not burning in the atmosphere.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

These satellites are designed to fully burn up on reentry. There is effectively zero chance of that.

On the flip side, the aerosols created by burning satellites destroy the ozone layer.

[–] Bimfred@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But it won't be a uniformly higher orbit, because there's only one event where energy was added to the fragments. The perigee will still be in LEO and anything that'd raise the apogee to a point where the new orbit would be stable for a decade would require so much energy that it'd vaporize the satellite on impact.

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It doesn't need to launch to stable orbit to date another orbiting satellite.

[–] Bimfred@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

No. Just pointing out that a collision in LEO physically cannot create a situation where we're locked in on Earth for more than a decade or two. The orbits will still have a perigee in LEO. They will still decay. The debris will still burn up eventually. Kessler syndrome is impossible in LEO. And in higher, larger volume orbits, it's overblown, because we don't even have enough mass there to create a notable debris field to lock ourselves in with.

A Kessler cascade is one of those things that people read about and it sounds really scary and plausible and happening, like, in a week cause Starlink exists. And that's where the thought process stops and the Chicken Little everyone has in their brain takes over.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I was confusing the long-term problem of re-entry with the long term problem of staying up there...

Even with heat shields they warm up the atmosphere and release particulates and gases

But you're right.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com -2 points 3 days ago

Some see doom. Some see a race for lightweight mega armored satellites.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

There is a simple solution: Musk will simply purchase the USA and use that military arsenal as a deterrent.

(/s... maybe)