this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

Web Design

234 readers
16 users here now

Team Web: CSS, HTML, JS, RSS, SVG, XML.

Civility is aggressively enforced: do not be rude, troll-y, flame-bait-y, etc. If someone else is, please report, block as necessary, and move on.

Comments that cannot reasonably lead to discussion or which have no analysis ("first!", "lol", [string of emojis]) will be deleted. Please do not post them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Five years ago, I hired a UX designer with exceptional soft skills. Articulate in meetings. Diplomatic with stakeholders. Created beautiful presentation decks. Responded to Slack within minutes with encouragement and emoji.

Three months later, the project failed because they’d agreed to every terrible idea anyone suggested.

Seventeen stakeholder requests. Fourteen contradictory features. Zero pushback.

The product launched as a compromise nobody wanted, designed by a committee nobody asked for.

Their soft skills were outstanding. Their design judgment was invisible.

That’s when I realized “great soft skills” in a job description usually means “won’t challenge us when we’re wrong.”

Which is exactly what clients don’t need but desperately want.

(Like hiring a doctor who agrees with your self-diagnosis.)

Now I hire differently.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pirat@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

Personally the qualities listed of this person who had "good soft skills" aren't good soft skills. People pleasing isn't a soft skill, is just being soft.

Communication and collaboration often necesitate conflict, and conflict isn't bad. Conflixt is often the stimulus for gorwth. Someone with good soft skills knows how to have "positive conflicts" and can be assistive with ideas and limitations.

I don't disagree with the assessment that most people's self assessment of soft skills means they are passivr people pleasers rather than compassionate assertive listeners and problem solvers.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Being “soft-skilled” as a “yes man” is easy. Being “soft-skilled” while negotiating between parties in a principled manner is much harder. I might try to suss out examples of how an applicant has navigated such difficult situations in the past.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The bigger question is how you hire UX designers that don't just think about the "X" of the most unskilled, tech illiterate "U"s and force everyone down to that level. The number of times I've seen complex but time saving features taken away under the guise of "simplifying" the interface is infuriating.

"Our dumbest users can't figure out how the existing group select/filter button works on a list of items so go ahead and individually click the checkbox for all 100 items because fuck you." This actually happened with a cloud based service I had to use for work once.

Also the classic "Let's make you click on each list item which opens a new page with the action buttons instead of putting the most common ones on the list itself because we care about how clean the interface looks more than the people who have to do repetitive tasks on each list item."

Also "Error messages are scary so we'll be as vague and condescending as possible and if you actually want to troubleshoot the ten million abstractions we hide behind a single button you can go fuck yourself." And its friend "We made a slick single page web app that only has one URL so you can't send the page you're on to your team members."

Honorable mention to "Instead of cluttering the interface with grayed out buttons, we'll pretend the options you don't have permission to access don't exist to make it as hard as possible to figure out what you're doing wrong or what permission you need to ask IT/your manager for."

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah so people don’t understand the value of being an argumentative son of a bitch sometimes at work (within reason). Literally yesterday I had a product person put in a request from a developer to get content to write and translate, basically, some text that the voiceover/talkback system would say automatically. My designer was about to just forward the request but it was such outlier that it triggered a 10 minute phone call that struck the requirement, struck the request and saved everyone involved from implementing something stupid/wasteful/unnecessary. So yeah, you do need to use some actual judgement in the job.

[–] Jela@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

This is really helpful as someone who's been in the job market for wayyyy too long (and someone who has plenty of soft skills) What do you look for in resumes now? Specifically, what skills or verbiage?

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I might be in this picture and don't like it. I abhor conflict so tend to agree with everyone, sometimes it leads to urgent deadlines. It's definitely something I need to work on, especially now that I have a mirror put up against me lol.

I guess the difference is I don't advertise having amazing "soft skills" because I'm too introverted for that.