They've been in Chicago for months but great job finally eventually getting around to this, supreme court. The terror has already been infected.
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
159 points (99.4% liked)
politics
26808 readers
3348 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This seems to be the way the Trump presidency is showing the weaknesses of American style democracy in a nutshell, isn't it? The president can defacto rule as king faster than the courts can reprimand and order an end to the breaches of law and even when they do, there seems to be no recourse or punishment for violating the court.
It's a demolition job by an unskilled idiot.
The conservative right has taken in the task of dismantling the government but instead of hiring a big piece of machinery ... they just handed a sledge hammer to a moron. Everyone will laugh at the idea and not think anything will come of it. But give the moron a year to just hammer away at walls, structure, beams, posts, wiring and eventually he'll begin to cause significant damage and start to threaten the whole structure.
These loopholes were fostered, not neglected into existence. He’s showing the weaknesses in the american federal government in the same way that I show my toaster’s inability to keep food cold.
The system is backwards.
Ridiculous actions should be put on hold to ensure they are not violating people's rights instead of letting rights get violated until SCOTUS gets around to it. It doesn't matter that the first court rulings do it in the right order, the problem is that when it goes to appeals they default to letting rights be violated. I don't know if this is recent or not, but the opportunity to abuse the system has always been there.
I think, in part, the speed at which things can be done now, sweeping, systemic, horrible things, is simply much much faster than when these systems were created.
It does still seem backwards but maybe they make more sense when you don't have instantaneous digital global communications.
All the checks and balances have the loophole that there's effectively nobody available to enforce them that the executive branch can't (and hasn't) already undermined.
The only remaining check and balance that has any possible credibility is the people, the people who threw the tea into Boston harbor, the people for whom the 1st and 2nd amendments exist, the people who conducted a million man march in defense of civil rights. Those people. And those people all seem to be stuck in some combination of: completely asleep at the wheel; too disorganized and busy fighting against each other over petty ideological distinctions; too busy trying to keep their heads down and scrape out a living while hoping this all goes away or somehow won't affect them; or jumping onboard the bandwagon themselves and cheering all this stuff along.
Bonkers.
And it's the same in the private sector; corporations that are rich enough just violate the law, and are almost never held to account. If they are, the fines are usually much less than half of the ill gains, so they just mark them as a cost of doing (illegal) business.
Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the opinion.
Sounds about right.
Sounds about white with a splash of uncle Tom.
So much "freedom" among that bunch.
Even in their ridiculous narrative about being overrun by brown foreigners, just what the fuck is the military even for?
He's going to do it anyways.