this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
12 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3613 readers
47 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge


You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.


Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world/



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There is one user in particular that I have no problem with otherwise, but they are just spamming a lot of the communities that I follow, and they remind me of some mid tier Reddit material that you either typically scroll over, or stop to see once, and then you regret your choice.

I have no problem with this account commenting (which they do), so I don't want to block them entirely; I just wouldn't like to see their posts.

I might be blind but I couldn't find an option for that. I'm mainly talking about the desktop environment of lemmy.world.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Skavau@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This bleeds into a function I've proposed in other contexts in the past for a soft-mute vs. block. I don't believe Lemmy offers variability here.

[โ€“] Dicska@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was afraid this would be the answer. But at least I know it's not just me - thanks!

[โ€“] Skavau@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago

You can hide individual posts on Piefed right now, but I guess that's not quite what you want.

[โ€“] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think you can separately block posts/comments.

But I wish we could for the opposite reasons. Lots of people post pretty good articles, but have terrible takes.

[โ€“] Dicska@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Haha, especially then! I wonder what's preventing the dev(s?) from making this possible.

[โ€“] daannii@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I've considered two reasons why Lemmy user and mod functions are very limited.

  1. Cost to bring in programmers to add these features. And
  2. Reddit may sue Lemmy over making their platform more similar.

As someone who first started using reedit around 2010, I do recall that most of the features were added with a big update at some point a few years later. Called "new reddit". And then additional mod features where also added over time.

Lemmy isn't as old and probably doesn't bring in the same amount of revenue.

Especially since reddit used to sell reddit gold which also was a major source of income. And allowed them to invest in software designers.

Lemmy doesn't have a ton of ads. Idk how much they make.

  1. Also maybe cause people will use it regardless because of no where else to go that the owners aren't motivated to improve it.

That's capitalism for you.

[โ€“] Dicska@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

That's a fine summary there, thanks. I don't think #2 would be a real threat: it's a bit like if Instagram wanted to sue Facebook because it also has a "follow" button. I totally understand the rest, and either is more than enough reason. Well, I hope they get there once, though.