this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
847 points (94.7% liked)

196

18910 readers
458 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just in case anyone doesn't know:

J.K. Rowling uses personal wealth to fund anti-trans org

J.K. Rowling is using her wealth attained from the Harry Potter series to create an organization dedicated to removing transgender people's rights "in the workplace, in public life, and in protected female spaces.”

You can "seperate the art from the artist", but can't seperate the Harry Potter royalties from the anti-trans funding.

Don't forget that she also has publicly said that she considers consumption of Harry Potter media as support for her political ideology. She herself literally made it a political stance.

[–] 2hundredpancakes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People seemed to have no trouble dropping Gaiman after his horrendous behavior came to light, but even suggest people drop their beloved nostalgia books and it's all "but my blorbo! JK bad I guess, but I like my blorbo!".

The sad part is that the HP-verse is so clearly not for us -- that is, not for anyone besides straight white liberal Christians. The stereotypes, the handwaves, the defense of the status quo. But people choose to engage with and perpetuate this media anyway.

People would rather just enjoy the blorbo than take a stand against what it represents/supports. Comfort is "easier" than tension.

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My Christian mom didn't let us watch Harry Potter because our church said it was evil. I guess it's not for Christians either, though I think that has changed and it's fine now.

[–] 2hundredpancakes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I forgot about that satanic panic stuff around HP. Maybe those xtians feel more comfortable now knowing she hates the same people they do.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, that was just boomer panic and the moms now are millennials that read harry potter.

As a millennial I'm dying 😭. I feel like many of us really split between "comfy cozy uwu" and jaded cynicism

[–] Valorie12@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup, a childhood friend of mine gave me the first Harry Potter book for my birthday, and my christian parents threw it away after they left because "it promotes witchcraft". Then I grew up and realized I was trans, and hate Harry Potter for an entirely different reason.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

i feel like people expect(ed) way too much out of harry potter because it sold well. then jo rowling turned out to be a terf and used her billions predictably. it's kind of like star wars, it's just taken a life of its own. you can't really help or harm jo rowling or george lucas anymore, except maybe make their social media intern sniffle a little bit. they simply have so much wealth their lives occur outside everyday reality anymore. the line goes up, it goes down, it has no effect on them except ego. they get to do what they want. they're going to fund harmful causes regardless. so do what you want.

[–] goodboyjojo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Trans rights and stuff

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 126 points 2 days ago (5 children)

There's a real dark irony in a book about a young boy quite literally coming out of the closet to discover his true self written by a woman who might as well be a Dursley.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

The irony disappears slightly when the whole slave liberation arc was literally Confederate propaganda that was so distasteful and irrelevant to the plot, it was cut from the movies.

The house elves love being slaves. It's the natural order of things.

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The real dark irony is Jo saying they probably would have transitioned when they were younger if they were aware of gender expression.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Harry Potter has no true self to discover. From the first to the last page of this pile of rags he is a wizarding Mary Sue with near-infinite privilege and the personality of an oyster. The story opens with "yer a wizard" in the first 50 pages and that's the end of his character arc. From then on he's a mere vessel for the reader to experience the world and the author to move the plot along.

.... As a matter of fact, what even is the biggest character arc in that story? I don't remember much, but Neville and Hermione have a glowup and Harry's uncle dies or something? And the weasleys open a shop? I certainly don't recall anything that lends credence to the idea that Rowling even believes that either individual people or societies are capable of profound change. The story begins and ends basically in the exact same place except the characters are 10ish years older.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago

And then he grows up to become… a cop.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Rocky Horror is a bit better than Harry Potter. DON'T dream it, be it.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

what about potter puppet pals. can we still watch that?

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If you pirate it, but honestly I don't think it's worth bothering. Harry Potter isn't even original it's not worth watching it or anything else part of it even if you pirate it.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

it’s not worth watching it

i mean i love alan rickman but yeah those movies were awful

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›