this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
358 points (96.6% liked)

Memes

14455 readers
911 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait

Americans don’t have those ?

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

We do but the "prize" isn't allowed to be contained in the candy. But the Hippos are better anyway

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Isn't that the Canadian version, avec l'emballage bilingue?!

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We have multi-lingual packaging here too. Where I’m from it’s usually quadrilingual, but it could have more or fewer.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well at least the ones we usually get here say Kinder Überaschung

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That word looks like "over-ashing", like a teenager overreacting to something their parents said by burning down the house.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's actually "Überraschung", two r's. Overreacting by developing several rashes?

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

über - over, above

rasch - rash (adverb), quick, hasty

So a literal translation of Überraschung would be something like overrashness. Something that happens very quickly and unexpectedly.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That just means Canadians are better than Americans too then.

😮A joke, building on OP. No human is inherently better or worse than another.

[–] madjo@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are US states who’d do well to become Canada’s 11th province.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

And they can fuck off. America is completely incompatible with Canadian values. The Democratic party is so far right leaning that they're almost a 1:1 to the Canadian Conservative party. Combine that with the demographics and Canada would immediately be thrown into a rightwing spiral.

No thanks. If they want to join Canada they can emmigrate like anyone else.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 5 points 1 day ago

4th territory

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

So Trump is not worse than your mom?

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

These are so disappointing nowadays that I don't bother trying anymore.

Two or three decades ago, the inside was gooey and runny. Eating one of these was a messy but delicious affair. Now every time I buy one, it feels like a dried paste that has nothing in common with what I was eating as a child. For a while I thought they were just old or bad but apparently it's just how they are now.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

and to any americans wondering why someone would even eat a cadburry creme egg outside of easter: in britain they're made of this magical substance called "food" and it really elevates the experience

[–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Loved these as a kid. They're the same in Canada

[–] 007ace@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Came here to say the same thing. My kids love them into their teens. Proud Canadian who can have toys in our food, without fear of accidentally eating the toys.

[–] fascicle@leminal.space 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What's the difference between the European version and the us version

[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The European version has the toy directly inside the chocolate egg, like you see in the photo.

The US version has the egg split in two inside. Both sides are plastic shells. One side has the toy, and the other side has a weird creme that you scoop out with an included plastic spoon.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

The US version has the egg split in two inside.

We have that version too

[–] pewpew@feddit.it 3 points 1 day ago

We also have the split version in Europe

[–] wdx@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Europe (at least Germany, primarily in Summer) has that very same kinder joy though?

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the US though you're not allowed to include toys inside the chocolate because "choking risk." We all think it's dumb too but honestly it just seems like we constantly have more important shit to care about, we're not taking to the streets for some chocolate eggs.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Turns out you're wrong, as is so frequently the case with "common knowledge."

The regulation that prevents it is one that precludes inedible material being added to food, aimed at the addition of sawdust or as a tool to smack down companies literally adding gravel dust into food in the Depression.

Of course, now they just call the sawdust cellulose-based fiber addictive.

One might wonder why, exactly, it is so suspiciously many Americans have such misconceptions about food and product safety regulations.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News-Releases/2006/CPSC-Warns-of-Banned-Kinder-Chocolate-Eggs-Containing-Toys-Which-Can-Pose-Choking-Aspiration-Hazards-to-Young-Children

This product is banned for sale in the United States because the toy surprise hidden inside can pose choking and aspiration hazards to children younger than 3 years of age

https://legalclarity.org/kinder-eggs-banned-in-the-u-s-laws-and-import-penalties/

The main concern for safety officials is the risk of choking for young children. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that objects embedded in confectionery can pose a public health risk because a child might unknowingly swallow the item while eating the chocolate. Under the FD&C Act, it is illegal to introduce such adulterated food products into interstate commerce, which prevents them from being sold or distributed within the United States.

So "yes" but also "choking hazard" and "I really don't care that much, they're just chocolate eggs."

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

They just believe whatever credible-sounding explanation fits the criteria and move on. I say "they" its not just an American problem I'm sure its a human thing. If you spend your whole life fact checking everything you hear youll be researching your entire life.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

For a long time there was no US version because one dumbass kid choked somewhere sometime or the other. Rather than accept the kid was foolish they banned them outright.

[–] ttyybb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Well can't argue with that

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wow cool, shitty chocolate with a cheap piece of plastic inside.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

The chocolate is good

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

in europe the kinder chocolate is much higher quality than in the us

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There was a place down the street selling these and we bought a few. We felt naughty.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

But Kinder chocolate sucks. It's not even better than Hershey's.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kinder chocolate isn't good, but Hershey's is straight trash

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hershey, what if chocolate tastes like vomit?

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

I'm not disagreeing with you

You are entitled to your opinion. I even am known to enjoy Hershey's from time to time. However I don't always want noticeable levels of Butyric acid in my chocolate.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In which country are you making the comparison?

Because that matters to chocolate

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Im USian. I prefer Lindt chocolate when I get chocolate at all. I don't eat many sweets these days.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

True! I used to buy these every time! The gifts inside where insane for the time.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

The true reason