this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
152 points (100.0% liked)

News

35749 readers
2602 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 800 employees delivered a petition to management, condemning the Trump administration’s use of Google technology in immigration enforcement.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Neither is effective. Unionize most of Google's workforce. Then make demands.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Walking is only not effective because others with lower ethics will take the money, right? And it should still be a skill cut and an image hit long term... presuming people favour not-fascism over more money, which admittedly isn't realistic

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Walking is only not effective because others with lower ethics will take the money, right?

Yes. Or rather not do anything to not get themselves fired, but that's equivalent.

Google won't even notice 800 people disappearing. Large corporations have enough redundancies.

Given historical precedents, it seems that people are okay with fascism for money. In fact fascism in the past and today has offered people prosperity by getting rid of some vulnerable group that's "getting too much resources" and getting the resources back. Of course it's never the oligarchs. That's how it tends to get consent to take power. This is occurring to varying degrees in more than a few countries today.

It's why relying on people's moral beliefs to fight fascism isn't super reliable, to say it mildly. Instead we gotta propose an alternative that offers prosperity without getting rid of vulnerable groups. Ergo unionize and take more money from Google as well as make other demands (as a short term alternative.)

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Just leave. At a certain point is the right move. 

You’re not going to have trouble finding a job with big G on your resume. 

[–] dugmeup@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Google: but govt revenue bro

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

~~Don't~~ Be Evil

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Curious what's going to happen. Not hopeful though.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[–] LemmyShemmy@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Workers can demand but doesn't mean their demand will be fulfilled. Its up to the Rich class to decide. Workers need to follow the company policy if they want to pay next months mortgage installment