this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
587 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

81024 readers
4843 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alzjim@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Mechanical Turk strikes again.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 5 points 3 days ago

Waymo knowing when it is stumped is actually a pretty good thing. Better than just running over cats & small children.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 139 points 5 days ago (3 children)

AI = Actual International-workers

[–] carrotfox@piefed.social 115 points 5 days ago (3 children)
[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Oh my god so what you're saying is that they left out rice and the Asians really did show up!

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Someone needs to slap an Asians Inside sticker in the same style as the Intel ones on the Waymos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

this is actually a great advert for waymo ai. taking a safety first approach better than humans can and referring to humans when in a situation in which it has no safe option

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 38 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Curious what the law is with regard to someone in the Philipines driving a car on US roads without a US driver's license.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's a mega corpo. Laws don't apply to them silly you.

[–] alzjim@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You will ignore the man behind the curtain!

The answer is of course proper regulation. Too bad that is ceasing to exist.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 3 days ago

With like 200 ping

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 69 points 5 days ago (10 children)

And these foreign crowd workers know the local traffic rules? Maybe they even have regular drivers licenses?

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 62 points 5 days ago (24 children)

I think the interventions here are more like: "that's a trash can someone pushed onto the road - let me help you around it" rather than: "let me drive you all the way to your destination."

It's usually not the genuinely hard stuff that stumps AI drivers - it's the really stupid, obvious things it simply never encountered in its training data before.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Feels like the robot hoovers when they encounter an unexpected poo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Saw this blog post recently about waymo's sim setup for generating synthetic data and they really do seem to be generating pretty much everything in existence. The level of generalization of the model they seem to be using is either shockingly low or they abort immediately at the earliest sign of high perplexity.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 44 points 5 days ago

This used to be my job. They're not controlling the cars. They're basically completing real-time CAPTCHAs, telling the car whether the cameras see a stop sign, a bicycle, temporary barriers, etc. If the car can't identify an object that could possibly cross its path, it pulls over and stops until an operator can do a sanity-check on whatever the car's confused by. They only need to be able to identify objects on the road, not know the rules of the road.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Automation has always been about de-skilling to cheaper, more abuse-able labour, and not about actually eliminating work. This goes all the way back to the broad looms and the luddites. There were still loom workers in the new factories - its just that they were children who could be worked to death for pennies.

[–] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

Well, automation under our current system, yes.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 40 points 5 days ago (5 children)

This would have actually been a great thing to not only acknowledge but promote if they weren’t so caught up in their own hype.

Not that I will ever get into one of those death traps but if you tell the average consumer that any failures in autonomy immediately engage a tele-operator “to keep you moving on your way” they would probably feel better about riding.

I’ve done tele-driving before and it’s remarkably good, even if latency is a concern.

It’s the facade of it all, the need to seem to live up to the hype. It’s going to get more people killed.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

any failures in autonomy immediately engage a tele-operator

One of the problems is that these "failures in autonomy" could include a failure to engage a tele-operator when one is needed.

They just stop moving when that happens. It's been the cause of many traffic jams.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

I work near downtown Austin, where both Waymo and Robotaxi operate.

Waymo cars are some of the best drivers on the road because they actuallyt ested their product, use multiple Lidar sensors instead of just cameras, and have remote driver backups for unusual situations.

Teslas drive like maniacs and will end a ride and tell the driver to get out in the middle of a lane.

[–] nixon@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

I’ve ridden in a few Waymo’s before, in SF they can be more dependable or easier to get than other ride options. I never felt like I was ever in danger in one.

Within my handful of experiences with them I’ve never had to use the help button or features to request assistance from a tele-operator but it was clear that they weren’t trying to hide the function from the passengers as the feature was explained and clearly labeled.

A friend who uses them often told me of the one time he needed to ask for assistance when their Waymo was stuck behind a doordash scooter with its hazard lights on that was either delivering or picking up and blocking a turn lane in downtown SF. The Waymo didn’t know what to do to get around it, my friend hit the button for assistance, a voice came over the speakers asking how they could help, my friend explained the situation and the tele-operator drove the car to safely navigate the situation. He said it was probably 1.5-2mins of tota inconvenience with 75% of that time was him wondering if he should hit the help button or not.

I understand a lot of AI implementation, such as Amazon Fresh or other business models have been hiding offshored human assistance within their “AI” features, which I do agree with you is deceitful but my experience with Waymo was not that. They did not hide or obfuscate that function and feature of the service but actively informed the passenger of its existence.

Granted, I haven’t ridden in one for almost a year at this point and I only did so in the SF market so things may have changed since or are different elsewhere.

Also, I can’t say that I follow the news intently about Waymo, I know they have run over a couple cats but I hadn’t heard anything about them killing people. Has that happened?

Nothing could make me feel better about my vehicle being operated remotely by someone in another country. Granted, nothing could make me feel better about my vehicle being operated by a computer either. I'll drive my damn self, thank you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

For anyone that is curious, Waymo actually is capable of remote moving the vehicles despite what they say. They do their best not to admit it's possible, but it's right in the CPUC filings as a footnote, and probably the only place they'll ever admit it.

https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/-/media/cpuc-website/divisions/consumer-protection-and-enforcement-division/documents/tlab/av-programs/tcp0038152a-waymo-al-0003_a1b.pdf

In very limited circumstances such as to facilitate movement of the AV out of a freeway lane onto an adjacent shoulder, if possible, our Event Response agents are able to remotely move the Waymo AV under strict parameters, including at a very low speed over a very short distance.

I'm not opposed or knocking that they can do this, but they are lying to or misleading people when they say it can't be done.

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 7 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Waymo really seems to be winning out over Tesla with the self-driving thing. I wonder how much of that is really just because Waymo cars have a remote human driving them in situations where a Tesla would just crap out

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

I'm not fully up to speed on Waymo and if they have ever released remote assistance/ miles details, but when Cruise went through that shit storm a year or two ago, it came out that that the cars were asking for help every few miles.

Cruise was essentially all smoke and mirrors.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)

Artificial artificial intelligence

[–] Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 13 points 4 days ago

Will they admit how much time the humans actually do the controlling.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Same for the delivery bots. They're all getting some remote control help.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

It's all mechanical Turks

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 4 days ago

If you keep doing the work for them, they'll never learn. They need to figure it out for themselves.

[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I still have no idea how these are legally able to operate on public roads. Shit seems wild to me. Wouldn't last 5 seconds here in Chicago, for numerous reasons lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago

AI stands for Actually ~~Indians~~ Filipinos

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago

this tech is doing great to devalue workers. drivers, this time.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Let's get rid of undocumented workers they said

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Anyone else not very impressed?

load more comments
view more: next ›