this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
63 points (100.0% liked)

memes

23668 readers
240 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Click here for the previous one. | Click here for the next one.

Cute Russian comic. The home of the official English version is here if anyone wants to skip ahead (or support them): https://boosty.to/gabiconomics-en

Cooperative(usually abbreviated to co-op) is an "autonomous association of people who voluntarily join together to meet their common needs in a democratically controlled joint venture". There's more than one type of co-op in economics; in our case it's a worker cooperative: simple workers joining together in a democratic fashion to alleviate business hardships while fairly distributing the rewards.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In the chart, "net income" is capital revalorization? As in, reinvested in increasing capital?

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They needed to save up for stockpiling wood before because they couldn't buy it at scale for discount, so I think it's safe to assume they're building an account for the shop so when they do need it to do things they have money ready.

Also it's almost exactly half after materials and rent.

[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I see. This shows also one of the main points of failure of coops in capitalism: lower salaries mean higher capital revalorization and higher future investment capabilities, so companies exploiting their workers more can use this extra capital accumulation to outcompete coops

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Very good point, maybe some of this will come up. I think however that money is usually being pocketed by shareholders and executives instead of workers. But they have the capability to pay less and do that to compete at the most ruthless level if they have to.

[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 3 points 12 hours ago

Thing is, shareholders can do both. Exploiting your workers more and expanding capital revalorization raises stock value because it increases expected returns in the future

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 19 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

come with me if you want the full value of your labor

[–] Bishop_Owl@hexbear.net 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Bishop_Owl@hexbear.net 3 points 16 hours ago

I feel like we should go back through and see if there's others, I saw the ancient aliens guy meme last week lmao, there's gotta be more

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 7 points 22 hours ago
[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sneeze and Rumples are very goblin-ey names

Also dwarfy tbh

I’m just glad it’s clear who’s who so I don’t end up with an intermediate state where I’m calling emojis :sneeze-or-rumples-thinking: gabi-dizzy