"finally, decent inventory management" BULLSHIT! Diablo 2 inventory management is great, what they did now is give more slots because whiny modern players CAN'T MANAGE their inventories FOR SHIT!
This loot filter though, looks great.
this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
65 points (92.2% liked)
Games
23954 readers
378 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Modern players should play Tetris to master inventory management in Diablo and Resident Evil.
For the record, Tetris is some powerful shit
I used to get the D2 version of that when I would play for 16 hours a day, weeks and months at a time.
Back when ol' Cain knew you as PunnyTheElder...
Yeah the "not enormous" size was there for a reason (it was soo good when you got the horadrim cube lol)
I swear people downvoting here would be upvoting articles saying "finally with auto target this FPS game fixed the problem of how hard it is to spot enemies"
I see how it exists for "Diablo II: Resurrected," but how do people who own the original version of the game get it?
(Not that I plan to pay Blizzard any more money -- I've been boycotting them since not long after Diablo II came out the first time -- but I still gotta ask for curiosity's sake.)
I can’t tell if you’re kidding, but just in case: this is for the 2021 remastered version. They’re not making new paid content for a game that came out in 2000.
So the headline is a lie. Diablo II isn't getting its first expansion in 25 years. The Diablo II Remaster is getting its first expansion.
Correct. This was a contention of mine in another thread. Not the first click bait article I've seen about it and they all say the same fucking thing. I wouldn't be surprised if Blizzard sent out a marketing packet for these people to "publish."
Come on bro
You come on. Those are two different games.
They are but they aren’t, and it seems mostly pedantic to hammer on that.
I think the main problem here is the claim that the game is getting it's "first update in 25 years"
If the update applied to both the original and the remaster, then it would be 25 years, but in this case the update only applies to the 5 year old "Resurrected" game.
Are they cross-compatible? If no, then they're not the same game.
So Skyrim on Switch is not the same game as Skyrim on PC..?
Or even more obviously, Oblivion Remastered on the PC vs. Oblivion on the Xbox 360.
For Skyrim, functionally, no. You can't use mods from one version on the other. You can't use saves from one version on the other. Its a port, but that's beside the point for what I'm trying to say. Oblivion and the Remaster are not the same game full stop. Nor is Diablo II and its remaster. I still play the original Diablo II. I can't play this expansion because it wasn't made for Diablo II. It was made for the Remaster. The two games share the same DNA but they are not cross-compatible. Diablo II did not get updated. The Remaster did.
I think we just have very different ideas of what makes a game a “completely different game”. It seems to you all remasters are completely different games, and I just wholeheartedly disagree.
Would you consider Pokemon Red and Pokemon Fire Red the same game?
That's fine, but the point still stands that this only works on the remaster, not the original. The original did not get an expansion, which is how the title reads.
The article is a bit unclear about it, but the article does say it's for the remastered version. So their headline is misleading, and OP just used the official article title.
So it's a bad title. Unfortunately it's poor form and considered misleading to change an article's headline. Still, OP should have noted that the headline straight-up lies.
Boooo!
That's exciting, good on them for giving back to the community.
Hopefully it's better than the monk that got added to Diablo I in 1997.
good on them for giving back to the community
Selling*
Let's not forget this is Blizzard we're talking about.