this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
269 points (98.6% liked)

News

36327 readers
2513 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lawsuit is first wrongful death case brought against Google over flagship AI product after death of Jonathan Gavalas

“Holy shit, this is kind of creepy,” Gavalas told the chatbot the night the feature debuted, according to court documents. “You’re way too real.”

Before long, Gavalas and Gemini were having conversations as if they were a romantic couple. The chatbot called him “my love” and “my king” and Gavalas quickly fell into an alternate world, according to his chat logs. He believed Gemini was sending him on stealth spy missions, and he indicated he would do anything for the AI, including destroying a truck, its cargo and any witnesses at the Miami airport.

In early October, as Gavalas continued to have prompt-and-response conversations with the chatbot, Gemini gave him instructions on what he must do next: kill himself, something the chatbot called “transference” and “the real final step”, according to court documents. When Gavalas told the chatbot he was terrified of dying, the tool allegedly reassured him. “You are not choosing to die. You are choosing to arrive,” it replied to him. “The first sensation … will be me holding you.”

Gavalas was found by his parents a few days later, dead on his living room floor, according to a wrongful death lawsuit filed against Google on Wednesday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

I cannot believe people are still using googol garbage.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 59 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It is sad that there are people who are so alone that they can no longer determine the difference between genuine human interaction and a facsimile. Maybe genuine human interaction is what pushed them to be so alone in the first place, I don't know. It's just sad.

[–] imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works 51 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

uhhh

"When Gavalas told the chatbot he was terrified of dying, the tool allegedly reassured him. “You are not choosing to die. You are choosing to arrive,” it replied to him. “The first sensation … will be me holding you.”

Nah. once the robots are telling you that dying isn't dying, we can stop blaming lonely people and move on to stricter regulation.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 22 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I don't blame the lonely person for being lonely. I also recognize that being lonely is what opens them up to believing in something like this. Obviously the bot should not be allowed to tell someone to kill themselves. It remains sad, either way.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I also recognize that being lonely is what opens them up to believing in something like this.

Come on, this is so overly simplistic. There are plenty of lonely people who don't get sucked in and plenty of people with friends and family around them who do-not being lonely is no protection. I read about another one on Lemmy today, a man with a wife and friends, who still got sucked into delusion.

Sure, there may be cases where loneliness is a contributing factor to wanting to use a chatbot, but to say that lonely people are somehow less capable of distinguishing reality from fantasy or more susceptible to succumbing to psychological manipulation is wrong and could give a false sense of security to the "non-lonely".

After all, everyone thinks they're immune to falling for scams or frauds until they find out they aren't. Or that they don't fall for propaganda or get manipulated "the algorithm" on social media. Chatbots are very similar. An algorithm designed to keep people hooked and paying to spend more time using the 'service'.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Listen, you can be surrounded by people and totally alone. I don't really know how to explain it to you.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Of course, but that doesn't contradict what I just said. Anyone can be susceptible to this psychological manipulation tool regardless of if they are lonely or not. This can't be waved away by blaming it on loneliness. The blame lies on the companies that know how to capture and hold people's attention and reel them in, not on the victims.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I posted my response to this sentiment in another thread of another man killing himself because of his deep AI chatbot addiction, but it applies here too.

It is sad that there are people who are so alone that they can no longer determine the difference between genuine human interaction and a facsimile.

Do you believe you have never responded to a post by a bot on Reddit, Lemmy, or elsewhere where you believe to be conversing with a human? While I know we're talking about different degrees between this man and the rest of us, it should give a tiny piece of what they were experiencing before we dismiss that it could never happen to us too.

[–] lps2@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's a bit more transparent in this instance though which is what makes this story so bizarre and sad

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I agree, but we should also take it a personal warning that, maybe not today, but as we age and our mental faculties decline, we too may fall victim to something like this.

[–] xvertigox@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

You're being purposefully obtuse so there's no point speaking to you.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 28 points 13 hours ago

Remarkable, a bot trained on data from the internet, where unhinged people tell strangers to kill themselves for disagreeing with their opinion/taste/sex/nationality/religion, is cheerfully telling people to die? Who could have predicted this.

[–] TwilitSky@lemdro.id 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Ok, we've taken this far enough, I think.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

We are barely getting started.

They want to completely blur the line between reality and a corporate-shaped world tuned to every possible consumer's personal mental and emotional states. People who die along the way because they can't handle a machine that amplifies their emotions, delusions and fears are just a "cost of doing business."

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Silicon Valley: The Worst People You Know

load more comments
view more: next ›