this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)

Military

1 readers
87 users here now

Red Army Forever

for posting on military topics

For Military Theory

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

US service people killed...worth about 75 cents to the Trump Administration.

[–] edm@thelemmy.club 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Can I sue the IRS and withhold my taxes until they can provide an option where my money does not go to this warmongering bullshit. And not lip service, audited by someone outside the government and untouchable pool of money that Congress can't divert. Only to be used for the things we actually want.

By law, every federal department must pass an annual audit. The Pentagon has failed to do so for 20 straight years and Congress has done nothing about it. The Postal Service will run out of money next year.

[–] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I know that the situations aren’t the same (more different than similar, honestly), but earlier I was reading a reassessment of the vastly overrated Axis Field Marshal Erwin Rommel and I could not help but be reminded of this:

Although the [Axis] had lost heavily since 26 May, with 9,568 Italian and 12,430 German casualties, by 30 August a massive supply effort by the Italians gave Rommel sixty-seven infantry battalions (including thirty-nine Italian), 536 guns (336 Italian), 515 tanks (281 Italian), 119 armoured cars (72 Italian), and 777 aircraft (427 Italian).⁷¹ But he squandered them in an attack with no prospect of success, against [an Allied] enemy alerted by Ultra and without his Italian intelligence.

By 3 September, he had taken 2,450 additional casualties, lost 50 guns and 400 AFVs, and wasted 10,000 tons of fuel. As early as 7 July Cavallero had foreseen disaster, and two months later Rommel delivered it. Having used up his fuel and reinforcements, he now adopted the same system of capisaldi (‘strong points’) used by Graziani in 1940, and for the same reasons.

Too weak to attack, lacking the resources for a viable mobile defence, under orders not to retreat, and unable to construct a defence in depth, the Axis forces could only await the inevitable [Allied] attack, and hope to survive it.⁷²

(Emphasis added. Source.)

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 7 hours ago

Too weak to attack, lacking the resources for a viable mobile defence, under orders not to retreat, and unable to construct a defence in depth, the Axis forces could only await the inevitable [Allied] attack, and hope to survive it.

This reminds me very much of another conflict going on right now.

[–] knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

$1.9B of DoW procurement contracts waiting to be signed.

[–] ThermonuclearHoxha@hexbear.net 10 points 18 hours ago

"Wars are expensive can I has $1 trillion more military budget next year? us-foreign-policy" — amerikkka