this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
81 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9007 readers
429 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

First sign of the bubble bursting?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 hours ago
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I was just at lunch with family members from around the country, and two of them said that big data centers had recently been turned down by their local politicians.

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 4 points 8 hours ago

I hear they’re pretty relentless and keep returning to places that rejected them

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

To the surprise of zero sane people 😮‍💨🤬

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 hours ago

I'm a bit surprised the bubble kept going as long as it did. It's absolutely wild how investors just kept throwing hundreds of billions at tech that didn't have any clear business model, no market fit, and wasn't making any substantial revenue.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Oh shit the first domino has fallen.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 hours ago

may we see more in the coming weeks

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 37 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Have we finally stopped pretending the layoffs are being caused by AI replacing workers?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If you had a customer service phone center job that was replaced with an AI chatbot, you certainly did lose your job to AI.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Not exactly. I'm sure there are specific cases where someone lost their job because AI does it better, but in most cases they lost their job because we're in a recession and the company needed to use chatbots to cut costs.

[–] III@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

...decided to use chatbots to cut costs. Also, AI doesn't do it better.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Well, it cuts costs in the short run. In the long run it's more expensive because (for most jobs) it does a worse job and requires human intervention to fix the problems it creates, but that's next fiscal quarter's problem.

[–] idriss@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I interacted once with a person fired from a QA position from Amazon (US) and she insisted that it was because of AI 100% so that kinda messed up my strong opinions tbh, maybe some are actually being fired because of it?

[–] fox@hexbear.net 7 points 9 hours ago

LLMs are fundamentally incapable of replacing jobs that do anything useful, but one of the main uses of an LLM is for an executive to posture that it will replace your job. And a lot of executives are fucking morons that genuinely believe LLMs can replace your job.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 hours ago

Well, I believe they told her that.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 22 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Oh I remember reading a month or so ago that the first biggest sign of the AI collapse was "Watch what happens at Oracle's upcoming earnings call in March."

Looks like it's not going well for the AI bubble

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 10 points 12 hours ago
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

Glad the Ellison wasted their money on blocking Netflix from monopoly then.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 23 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 12 hours ago

They will have their ROI, both in money and chattel slaves.

[–] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 14 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So oracle eats its seed corn to build even more fucking data centers rather than accept the risk evaluations of their lenders.

Man, what god damn geniuses over there. I bet they can't wait to have their ghost writers felate them over this decision in their future "autobiographies" that will be for sale at the airport. Oh wait, silly me, there's no ghost writers anymore!

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

They have an ironclad contract with OpenAI, they can't just opt out.

[–] allende2001@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Looks like Iran scored another hit on the AI bubble.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 12 hours ago

I wish they'd score more, and multiple on ~~Stacks Mobile~~ Star Link, too.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 6 points 13 hours ago

Oracle is refashioning as a bank