Bruh, the US has no room to speak. Overlooking the bluffs in Bakersfield, California looks way worse than any of this lol it's nothing but oil rigs for miles lol
China
Discuss anything related to China.
Community Rules:
0: Taiwan, Xizang (Tibet), Xinjiang, and Hong Kong are all part of China.
1: Don't go off topic.
2: Be Comradely.
3: Don't spread misinformation or bigotry.
讨论中国的地方。
社区规则:
零、台湾、西藏、新疆、和香港都是中国的一部分。
一、不要跑题。
二、友善对待同志。
三、不要传播谣言或偏执思想。
Boycott, Deadvertise, Unsubscribe, No-Links: The New York Times, all the consent that is fit to manufacture. https://newyorkwarcrimes.com/
Like when the BBC put sepia filter on Jason's vids, got called out, then sneakily corrected it
Yep, Brian Berletic made a great video about that incident where he demonstrates in Photoshop exactly how the BBC applied said gray filter.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Hello comrades, this thread is extra high quality. Wanted to say I've saved it for future reference and teaching. Got to dispel China myths.
Thanks, that's what I want this to be since I noticed Lemmygrad lacked any good posts about this issue.
I say it's more because of where and when they took these photos, those do the "grey filter" already. They took them in winter in northern provinces, where the trees and shrubs become bare and heating with coal is still prevalent so there's often a haze. Meanwhile the grassy oil silos are a stock photo by Reuters from spring 2020 in warmer Oklahoma.

The solar field in Shanxi is in a dry, eroded landscape that has lots of exposed soil: for comparison, below is such a landscape in summer, from China Daily. Then there's the black tarp of a construction site nextdoor on top.

The photo in Zhengzhou is literally a field of black and white cars in an industrial park. Roofs are the only bright colours present.
One could say: "It's barely spring, can't help it." But why bother taking your own photos now if you throw in stock photos anyway? I say it's because they wanted to give their photographer something to do and a contrarianism that goes: "China takes these photos when it shines, but it doesn't shine all the time, eh?
"
The issue is the weather excuse is the same one Westerners use against Russia, which also gets the gray filter treatment. Westerners have continued from the original use of the filter against the Soviets to make all their cities look bad. It seems no matter what day, BBC and NYT photographers always take pictures on the foggiest, cloudiest days imaginable in China and Russia.
This visual propaganda serves the same purpose as the "at what cost" smear articles: to construct in the minds of Westerners an image of China/Russia/USSR as a colorless, joyless dystopia that 'needs Western democracy' to see color again.
There are examples from earlier years that are much worse and more obvious.
For instance, in a 2020 report on Wuhan, BBC deliberately applied gray and yellow filters to video from China aired to English viewers, while keeping the filters off for Chinese viewers:^[https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202102/1215710.shtml]

In 2021, when writing a hit piece against Western Youtubers in China, the BBC applied a gray filter to a screenshot from one of the Youtuber's (Jason Lightfoot's) videos. This video by Brian Berletic explains exactly how they doctor said images:

You're right and I agree, I just wanted to note that the "grey filter" doesn't have to be a literal post-processing filter like the "grey trees" were (I remember that ridiculous moment); bad-faith framing and lying by ommission are much more common than outright lying in Western media. I'm quite a pedant on these sorts of things.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

It's crazy that they think the guy got rolled over by the tanks, but nope! A couple of people (civilians, not soldiers) came and escorted him off of the road lol 😂
Here's another hilarious set of photos.
For their article fearmongering about China leaking coronavirus from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, MIT Technology Press had their photographer pick the foggiest day of the year to lie in a ditch in front of the lab to make the ditch look like a wall. Of course, the Chinese security guards were very confused:

Another common trope is taking close-up shots of random Chinese police and security guards to make China seem oppressive and create the false impression that they sneaked into some compound.^[https://x.com/XuZeyu_Philip/status/1367623852029661187] This is how they get said shots:

And here is the shot being sold:

https://www.chinadailyhk.com/hk/article/369568
Shaanxi solar facility shot by China Daily, for comparison.
I'm less bothered by it now.
2 years ago, if you had shown someone both photos they'd have surmised that the Chinese version is oversaturated because it stands to reason because China bad.
It's very different now
Sorry, wrong province actually. Shanxi, not Shaanxi. The contrast with the NYT is basically the same though:

The article itself is actually not bad (I skimmed).
Here's another comparison from photos I've personally taken.
First is Shanghai's Jin Mao Tower according to the BBC, second is a photo I took in the same area:



