this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
93 points (100.0% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

14426 readers
1604 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
02-19 SFA 1x07 "Ko’Zeine"
02-26 SFA 1x08 "The Life of the Stars"
03-05 SFA 1x09 "300th Night"
03-12 SFA 1x10 "Rubincon"
TBA SNW 4x01 TBA

In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Starfleet Academy


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Star Trek: Starfleet Academy" will end with its upcoming second season, Variety has learned exclusively.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I can honestly take this, though I do want more Star Trek content. I will continue to watch the show, but it's really asking for a lot of suspended belief in each episode. A random sampling of my problems with the show:

  1. You take fresh, untrained to partially trained students, put them in a mobile school, and then intentionally fly that ship full of children into known dangerous areas of space?

  2. We've had decades of the best in Starfleet fully commissioned officers solving complex problems, and the academy is full of professors and other well educated professionals, yet with every weird anomaly, the approach is, "fuck it let's let the kids handle this one"

  3. Terse negotiations with a previous and potential new member of the federation are done as a spectacle at the academy in front of the students and almost no other high level members of Starfleet, instead of literally anywhere else?

There are many more, but at some point I had to just turn my brain off to continue watching. I'm not used to having to do that so much with Star Trek.

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

That's a shame. There were certainly parts about the show I could nitpick, it is far from perfect. But I enjoyed it. Glad to at least get a season 2.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

If someone had told teenage me that there would be star trek and star wars that not only would I never see but never care to see. heck sci fi in general. its wild.

[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am genuinely happy to hear that Alex Kurtzman is leaving the Star Trek franchise, fuck that guy.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s not in the announcements

Variety confirmed that CBS Studios and Kurtzman are continuing to be in negotiations for a renewed partnership.

[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Quoting the article: "According to an individual with knowledge of the situation, Kurtzman and CBS Studios are currently in talks for a new deal that will keep him in the CBS fold"

I personally take that as he is staying at CBS but leaving Star Trek, especially since the new Star Trek movie has no connections to him.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It depends on whether the intent is to integrate the movies and television.

No one involved with the new movies has proven their ability to deliver on Star Trek, whatever their other credentials.

It would be a major risk to give any untested production company and EP the kind of multiyear contract needed to run the franchise.

[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Personally I have a much higher chance of going to see the new movie if it has NO ties to Kurtzman, and I am not alone in my friends-group for that opinion. I only went to see Star Trek Beyond because it was a fresh take mostly written by Simon Pegg (A known ST fan), and I think it's the best of the three new movies.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 5 points 22 hours ago

Definitely a YMMV situation. I have seen all three Kelvin movies and liked the first best of the lot

Beyond didn’t redeem itself for me. The motorcycle ridiculousness put it in the Nemesis category for me. There’s also the fact that none of the rest of the family would watch with me after the first one.

That said, the movies are being led by completely different people at this point.

Kurtzman is only negotiating television production not movies. My point was that the movie people have yet to prove themselves in even being able to deliver a cinematic feature in the franchise. So, would be an extreme risk to lock a 5-7 year deal that includes television production.

[–] FoD@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have watched all of trek except TOS (just a few famous episodes only).

I just couldn't get into this show and that's okay, I don't need to love every show. Sad to see less Trek as there should be Trek for every type of audience but if they are cancelling then I'm guessing the show didn't find its mark with people.

I don't know how to appeal to younger audiences, there are people smarter than me to figure that out but I hope to have a trek for me again someday.

[–] fixmycode@feddit.cl 2 points 1 day ago

The algorithm felt it wasn't hitting the right taste clusters

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 53 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

”…the show failed to find its significant audience.”

Put a show on a streamer that is targeting a completely different audience, and let the entitled vocal fans run wild with unchecked brigading, and then be surprised by low “crowdsourced” ratings.

Sigh.

This is depressing, if accurate, in that it may also be a signal that the new owner is looking for a new production company to manage the franchise just when things had finally and consistently stabilized with Secret Hideout.

I’m not hopeful for an SNW continuation in a Year One show, or Tawny’s project either.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It does seem like Paramount+ has a problem with drawing younger people - stuff aimed at younger demographics doesn't seem to last long (with the exception of Spongebob). I always thought SFA's success was a bit of a long shot for that reason.

And ironically, merging with HBO Max might actually help with that, but it won't come soon enough.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago

Prodigy was amazing though.
Did a single person hear about it before the cancellation notice? Well, no. But it's still somehow our fault that it was cancelled, and not their fault for utterly failing to promote it in any way.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Paramount+ is the new 'Friday night time slot.' If they actually gave a shit about having the show being successful, they would've syndicated it to a streaming service people actually use.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is depressing, if accurate, in that it may also be a signal that the new owner is looking for a new production company to manage the franchise just when things had finally and consistently stabilized with Secret Hideout.

I'm sure they are, and suspect that this would be the trajectory regardless of Academy's viewership. The new ownership will be looking to develop a new, more fascism-friendly flavour of Star Trek in the next few years. Tremendous shame, but not a surprise.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 44 points 1 day ago
[–] TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago

My kids and me love this show 😩

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago
[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 29 points 1 day ago

Oh man this is really sad. I liked SFA way more than I thought I would. The cast was top notch, and they had some good stories. Genuinely sad to see this one go.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 30 points 2 days ago

Well, I'll be damned. The hate campaigners seem to have won, despite solid signs that the show was actually doing quite well with the target group — internationally, if less so in the US?

This is very sad news, the show seemed to go from strength to strength in its first season.

[–] billmason@startrek.website 23 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Random reactions:

  • Disappointed but not surprised.
  • Even though the article leaves this an open question, I will be surprised if Kurtzman returns after this.
  • At least they didn't memory hole S2 as a tax write off.
  • I wonder if they will attempt (and be allowed to attempt) to rework the S2 'cliffhanger-ish/lite' ending into something else, or if it's just impractical to rework a "part 1 of 2" episode into a 1 episode contained story.
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well, damn.

There's inevitably (and understandably) going to be a lot of speculation about what, exactly, led to this decision, but...in the absence of any further information, I'm just going to be bummed about it.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A more measured take VS than I can manage at present.

My partner commented “It wouldn’t take much with the Ellisons” when I said it was reportedly canceled but, I have been hoping that there just might be more sophistication in the analysis of the show’s potential in a bigger, broader streamer.

My own thoughts go to women like my mother-in-law now in her 90s, or the superfan Bjo Trimble, who watched and supported Star Trek and other science fiction media, decade after decade, without seeing many women like themselves in principle roles.

They weren’t watching because of their husbands or kids, they were enjoying science fiction for themselves and their views, and all the related licensed media and merchandise they bought produced exactly the same advertising and other revenue.

Yet, entitled middle aged guys — who aren’t even in the key youth demographic anymore — want to define the franchise and seem to be being listened to.

Older person that I am, I recall the boys in the neighborhood would take their toys and wouldn’t join imaginative play unless they got to be the hero. I guess they never changed.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bjo Trimble

One of the organizers of the letter-writing campaign that saved TOS for a third season, for folks who don't know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] billmason@startrek.website 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Here's the first (big FWIW/grain of salt/etc) thing on the decision that's I've seen (besides the TrekMovie article note that 'it's no secret that the show didn't Nielsen chart'). From author Mike Chen on Bluesky.

From the few insiders I know, viewership was actually above expectations and this was more of a "future of the franchise" corporate decision. I'm expecting Trek to be in flux as there are SO MANY variables. Everything from tech stocks to Iran to midterms is impacting Paramount.

Leaving the link to his post here for reference but he has his posts hidden unless you're logged into Bluesky.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 20 points 2 days ago
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago

WHAT?!??!? NNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does that mean we're not even going to get a nice ending for season 2?

Hopefully they had enough of a sense it was coming to wrap things up.

[–] billmason@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, they did a cliffhanger.

Now you have to wonder if they can untangle it into one coherent finale episode, and if Paramount will even give them the approval to untangle it in the first place.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

they did allow disco to shoot additional scenes to make the season finale a series finale. I hope they allow SFA to do the same

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Ellison death-to-woke is underway.

Next up: Rambo reboot

load more comments
view more: next ›