this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
179 points (99.4% liked)

News

36784 readers
4367 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Trump has claimed he is “going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS” and is currently lobbying the US Senate to effectively outlaw the practice as part of his push to pass the Save America Act.

The conservative justices on the US Supreme Court appear eager to assist with Trump’s crusade.

On Monday, the justices heard a challenge from the Republican National Committee and the Trump administration to a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted up to five days after Election Day as long as they are postmarked by the day of the election. Sixteen states have similar grace periods on the books, and 29 states accept ballots from overseas and military voters sent before or on Election Day but received after. The New York Times found that during the 2024 election “at least 725,000 ballots were postmarked by Election Day and arrived within the legally accepted post-election window.”

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the most right-wing appellate court in the country, struck down Mississippi’s law in the run-up to the 2024 election in what UCLA law professor Rick Hasen called a “bonkers opinion.”

But at least several Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices want to turn that bonkers decision into settled law—at the very moment that Trump is trying to eliminate mail ballots nationwide and “take over” elections.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smeg@infosec.pub 43 points 2 days ago

As a US citizen who lives overseas and has to vote in a state with byzantine practices, they usually only send me my digital ballot form less than 30 days before the election. To mail it and have it received before election day, I would have to mail it within a day or two. Not a lot of room for mail delays.

Oh wait, DeJoy has been sabotaging USPS efficiency for years.

Guess we can give up on that "no taxation without representation" line

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

And I just read an article that Trump just cast a mail ballot in Florida. Fucking hypocrite.

Trump uses mail in voting ffs

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm not fully convinced this benefits Republicans that much. If voting is harder it'll mean that the people who vote either have more time or more motivation. Republicans have more time, but Democrats have a lot more motivation.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago

Mail in voting is an equalizer. Nearly everyone lives very close to a place that accepts outgoing mail, with most at their own homes. Once you require people to physically go somewhere special to vote, then you can put the squeeze on everyone there, in an extremely unequal way. You remember the stories of people waiting 8 hours to vote in Atlanta? Coming soon to everywhere statistically identified as "blue".

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Voting will be harder mostly for people who vote left. So even if some Republican voters are disenfranchised it will still be a positive swing for the GOP

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Yes, but of the people on the right for whom it'll be harder to vote: how many of them will be motivated to make the extra effort?

I guess the GOP has calculated it and determine this particular cheat is worth the effort. I just hope they got it wrong.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Don’t forget the military. This will disenfranchise a large proportion of active duty members

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

This asshole is going to be the first person after he bans mail in voting to mail in his vote