this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
839 points (97.3% liked)

memes

20676 readers
1608 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OR3X@lemmy.world 54 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (10 children)

The people saying "just pay for premium" don't seem to understand that in the beginning YouTube was free and had no ads. When google purchased it they promised to keep it that way. Then they slowly started with ads. At first they were pretty unobtrusive banners, then a short skippable preroll then multiple preroll then unskippable preroll. The reason I refuse to pay for premium is because Google created this issue and is now selling the solution. I refuse to be a part of that. It has nothing to do with the creators.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 2 points 22 hours ago

The people saying “just pay for premium” ~~don’t seem to understand that in the beginning YouTube was free and had no ads~~ were born after the 2008 housing crash

Ftfy.

[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The cost of hosting YouTube itself doesn't pay for itself unfortunately. They could get away with it back then because the internet itself wasn't that big. Therefore, we need to KICK THE NORMIES OUT OF OUR INTERNET. WE WERE HERE FIRST, REEEEEE

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Google reported an annual gross profit of $240.3 billion last year.

They can fucking pay for YouTube

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's even worse, their net was $132 billion

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/GOOGL/alphabet/net-income

So even after expenses, the profit of alphabet group was obscene.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's even worse, they laid off approximately 12,000 employees in 2024 alone.

So even after everything, the profit of alphabet group was obscene.

[–] Pman@lemmy.org 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

ReVanced and Grayjay do the same thing but for free and are open source so long as Google keeps trying to engineer enshitification the proud people of the open source community will engineer a solution.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago

I would totally pay for youtube if it was even remotely decently priced.

You can get multiple concurrents on disney+, Hulu or Netflix with blockbuster content for the same price as youtube's slop filled premium family.

Seriously, the service is worth maybe $9 a month. I don't want their music, i won't use it, the quality is crap.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 210 points 5 days ago (11 children)

"Experiencing interruptions? Find out why" - Naah I'm fine dude, just take your time.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 152 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh no! The video is black for a few seconds instead of showing several ads for a minute! Whatever am I going to do???

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 105 points 4 days ago (22 children)

Even if they keep the screen black for 30 second to a minute, I'd still gladly wait in silence than be subjected to advertisements.

If they ever make it impossible to watch videos without first watching ads, then I'll just leave the platform. I have no loyalty to YouTube and I'll sooner dump the platform and move on to other video sites than deal with enshittification and ads.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If they ever make it impossible to watch videos without first watching ads, then I’ll just leave the platform.

Yep. Then it will be time to finally start exploring peertube or something...

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

i wish peertube had more/better discovery tools

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] arcine@jlai.lu 15 points 4 days ago

I'm watching a 4h video. I can wait 5 seconds for it to load 😂

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago

Oh that's why it says this? Guess I'll block this message too.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 4 days ago
[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 71 points 5 days ago (7 children)

I’ll never pay for YouTube ever.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago

I was happy to pay for YT Premium when there was a loophole so you could sign up from a far cheaper country. I paid about £6 a month for the family plan, purely so I could watch on Apple TV without having to tolerate adverts.

Then they closed the loophole, shitcanned our premium, and demanded £20 for the same experience. We had Netflix at the time, which was cheaper. So I made a little app as a frontend for yt-dlp, and downloaded what I wanted to watch into my Jellyfin server.

Fuck Google.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 26 points 4 days ago

The best part is that Youtube ad revenue is low enough that everyone who can is doing their own sponsor segments, so paying for Youtube to remove their ads doesn't remove a lot of the ads. The only way to an ad-free experience is adblock+sponsorblock.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pewpew@feddit.it 47 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I would pay if it was a quality service and not ran by clowns

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] djdarren@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

With the glorious return of Tom Scott, I finally signed up to Nebula yesterday, and am pleasantly surprised at how many of my YT regulars are already on there. £30 for a year, no ads, and an Apple TV app.

Which is £30 more than I paid YouTube, because the family plan is a ridiculous amount of money.

[–] imjustmsk@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Unlock origin always always always free

[–] Xylight@lemdro.id 18 points 4 days ago (5 children)

They're eventually gonna start banning accounts for this and then requiring login to view YouTube.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I doubt they’ll ever actually do it, just threaten it constantly.

They’d rather have people without accounts, and/or using adblockers keep using the site. If they started actually cracking down, then it would create a significant pool of users who would use some other platform. They’d rather eat the losses of some people not viewing ads then push a significant amount of users to a potential competitor.

Much like how Microsoft hasn’t cracked down on unlicensed windows installs because it would push a significant amount of people to look for an alternative OS.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

My favourite unexpected bonus from switching to Linux has been a completely ad free youtube experience. Not entirely sure why this magic is happening but I love it.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

On windows Firefox + ublock origin is an ad free experience for YouTube. Any chance you picked a browser that has ublock origin added hy default?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›