this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
443 points (99.1% liked)

News

36870 readers
2959 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A 31-year-old Georgia woman has been charged with murder by police who say she took pills to induce an illegal abortion.

If state prosecutors decide to move forward with the murder charge brought by local police against Alexia Moore, her case would be one of the first instances of a woman being charged for terminating a pregnancy in Georgia since it passed a 2019 law banning most abortions.

The arrest warrant charging Moore with murder uses language that echoes the law, saying police determined that Moore had been pregnant beyond six weeks “based on the medical staff’s knowledge that the baby had a beating heart and was struggling to breathe”.

“No one should be criminalized for having an abortion,” Dana Sussman, senior vice-president of the advocacy group Pregnancy Justice said in a statement, calling Moore’s case “an unprecedented murder charge for an alleged abortion”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 141 points 1 week ago (3 children)

how far away is the US from stoning women in public?

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 116 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That would be barbaric. Instead, we let them die of sepsis or bleed to death from their genitals.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or have their body kept artificially alive as an incubator for a fetus.

[–] Duranie@leminal.space 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And find a way to charge the fetus for the hospital bill after delivery.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago

I believe the grandparents in that scenario are on the hook for the hospital bills for keeping that baby alive. It's so fucked up.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do you think they try to keep it alive?

[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Kids tend to grow old and the rapist in charge don't like them too old. So you need to maintain a supply and those who are too ugly can be slaves.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They wouldn't do that. That's a waste of breeding stock after all. She'll simply be tagged and delivered to an incel.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

What about trans women?

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

About trrreee fiddy inches.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The police investigator obtaining the warrant wrote that Moore told the nursing staff: “I know my infant is suffering, because I am the one who did the abortion. I want her to die.”

That reads like planted testimony, and if it comes to court, it needs to be VERY well stated that it is a 3rd person account, and not a direct admission of guilt.

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There’s no guilt to be had no matter what she said. Her body started to create a baby that she didn’t want, so she aborted it. Case closed. There’s nothing wrong with that.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Idiot Senator in 2005: "The body has a way of shutting down unwanted pregnancies"

Society: "WITH THESE PILLS"

Because #science and #freedom

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're equivocating "guilt" as in feeling at fault/remorseful about doing something immoral (the definition you used), with "guilt" as in it being proven that she violated a law (the definition @chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world used).

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I meant guilt, as in legally.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 68 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Brings to mind a meme I just saw posted a bit ago...

[–] criscodisco@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anti-choice terrorists bombed clinics and murdered healthcare workers and patients, and somehow they still won. Makes you wonder…

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Not me. People just don't pay attention.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hey look at that, even though everything else about reality is off in 2026, comedic timing is on point.

It might actually be funny if it was all just a joke instead of hypocrisy for the sake of rubbing in what they can get away with. Which is pretty much anything.

[–] Jo4ted@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

By their logic, cancer treatments are murder. It's a collection of human cells developing in your body, independent of the host.

I don't understand these guys, man. Someone else's ability to have an abortion doesn't stop you from not having one. "Pro-choice" doesn't mean "abort all babies." Same way blood transfusions aren't illegal just because some religions forbid it.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They believe a fetus is a “unique person” and no amount of logic or rationality will change their minds. Nothing else matters to their sick, sociopathic minds.

[–] Jo4ted@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

I watched a video today about how MAGA'ts only debate people for publicity. I more like to think they're just too stupid to comprehend anything other than "muh relygion!" Whatever reason, yes, nothing else matters to them.

It was a GeneticallyModifiedSkeptic video, don't remember specifically which one, but it was a great watch imo.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

She should seek asylum in a blue state. I'm serious, put that in play cause this is medieval shit they are trying to do and it should be fought as such.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago

Ah darn can't make it there before a Flock camera catalogs the car you're riding in and state police immediately intercept you.

[–] logicslayer@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We failed her. That's pretty much it.

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Her and others. Once more women see this article they’ll be reluctant to get life-saving treatment which will result in many unnecessary deaths.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Backwater shithole in a shithole country

[–] Martyy@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Since when is it murder for a woman to decide what happens to her own body? This is fucked up

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

see the thing is they don't view it as her own body. not that part of it.

My first thought was what the hell is going down in Geogia? then I realised this isn't about the nation in the Caucasus, but in the US, so that tracks.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait, so all it takes is for the police to "say" you took pills? What about a fucking miscarriage? Like this miscarriage of justice?

[–] scbasteve@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To get arrested? Yeah. To get prosecuted? Technically no

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

We ought to make conservatism illegal, the way Germany made being a Nazi illegal.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In other news, sales of these devices are stronger than ever.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

anti-cock device

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's for women to wear in their vaginas when they believe sexual assault is unavoidable. It has spines pointing inward that will hook onto a penis to stop the assault and punish the assaulter.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Seems like a good way of getting r****, and then abruptly murdered, if you ask me...

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

You really didn't want to know... But since you asked, penis goes in, but it doesn't come out.

[–] MasterNerd@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Up next: Woman suffering from miscarriage charged with manslaughter

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Martyy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

What the fuck is wrong with poeple

[–] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Blessed be the fruit

[–] mellowistheyellow@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Then why isnt the president of the US charged with murder? Literally bombing schools and killing kids.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Women should be leaving these red states in droves until they are nothing more than pedofile mouth breather male loneliness epidemic enclaves

load more comments
view more: next ›