this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
787 points (99.5% liked)

memes

20676 readers
1709 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chev@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Difference is importance

[–] TimeNaan@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

This is the optimal Wii playing position

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 17 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Don't you just hate it when you do tons of research to prove someone wrong, but it turns out they were right?

[–] Ravel@sh.itjust.works 7 points 15 hours ago

I actually kind of like it. It means my internal model of reality becomes a little more accurate.

I still probably use some flimsy, too much energy to discredit argument back though if they were dicks about it, or I am drunk.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

My research shows you are wrong.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

A lady who supposedly "worked for a water company" and won't drink tap water argued very confidently this morning that the little flakes you can see in tap water are not minerals. I put on my serious research face, but only had to do one Google search (they're minerals).

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

what were they to her then? government tracking chips?

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

Hey at least you guys all have fact checkers in your pockets now lol

Imagine what this was like when we had to go to the library and find a book to prove them wrong lmao

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 34 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Imagine if that was one long spaghetti and you could just suck the whole thing without chewing.

[–] Amelia42@piefed.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 day ago (7 children)

You're so unbelievably wrong, and let me explain why in this comment.

There is no physical way to efficiently and effectively cook a single spaghetti noodle, as no commercial cookware would accommodate such a noodle.

Furthermore, removing the noodle and placing it in a plate without the gargantuan noodle separating into smaller noodles, due to weight and lateral shearing, would be unheard of due to the physics of the gravity of the world's... physics.

Here I have included a link to my sources to you can educate yourself, you silly silly SILLY goose

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33374933/

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago (10 children)

How about a fresh (as in not dried) spaghetti noodle that's passed directly from the extrusion, through a trough of boiling water with a conveyor belt to move it along and support the weight, then direct to the plate?

[–] Amelia42@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Well that would be fantastic, if not for Article 128 in the Costituzione Della Repubblica Italiana; as this states no pasta may be cooked directly from extrusion, except in the circumstances of impending death, as laid out in Article 110. So you may certainly try such a procedure, but you risk becoming an international criminal.

I've looked at it from every angle, as I am certified the best master debater.

[–] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

See the thing is just because there is a law or article or what ever about it, doesn’t mean it’s going to get followed or that - that action is physically undoable.

There are laws saying we can’t do stuff, but people break them anyway.

So the conveyor idea might work perfectly fine therefore proving you wrong about this whole debate.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER ~/s~

[–] Amelia42@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 54 minutes ago

Break the... law? On... purpose??

THIS ONE RIGHT HERE OFFICERS COME QUICK

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This is actually how internet debates go. I should know, I'm an expert!

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They have really long noodle cafes in China where they regularly serve noodles in the 20 meter range. In fact, China even has the world record.

[–] Amelia42@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Incredible, you have bested me at my own game. The link you provided is relevant and interesting, the information is concise and factual, and you used metric instead of imperial (the more intellectual measurement system)

Thank you for freeing me from my role as professional Internet debater.

I'm free^eee^^^eee^^

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

adjusts fedora

I think you’re giving a bit too much credit here. The link may have been relevant, but that doesn’t automatically make the argument complete or correct—concise information can still omit important context or nuance.

Also, calling metric the “more intellectual” system is more of a preference than an objective truth. Both systems have their uses depending on context, and framing one as inherently superior doesn’t really strengthen the discussion.

And as for being “free,” stepping away from one debate doesn’t really mean you’ve escaped the role—you’re still engaging, just from a different angle. That pull to argue and evaluate doesn’t disappear that easily.

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

adjusts tweed cap

Got any sources there bud, or you just trying to speak facts into existence? I think Kant would like to have a word about your philosophy of "freedom". I won't go into anymore detail though...

[–] Amelia42@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yeah? Well... ur mom

😎

(im sorry)

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

You're right, i should inspire to be more like my mother, thank you, you have helped me see the error of my way

Is what i would like to say, but sadly this is the Internet so instead i am forced to say "no u" 😞

[–] trigital_cowboy@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

You have a final exam coming up tomorrow, don't you?

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Long pot of water would do it

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

You absolute fool! You think you can just link a source to prove your point, and nobody would actually read it?

Your source speaks nothing of the shearing forces of cooked spaghetti noodles... it's a paper about lentil-fortified pasta and it's nutritional gain vs change in texture

Zero to do with the ability to cook one very long noodle. In fact, it absolutely can be done, with a conventional pot of boiling water and making sure it's al dente. My source for your learning pleasure. Now who's the silly silly goose‽

https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/1/4

[–] Amelia42@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Oh no, I've been found out-

Hol up

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 2 points 15 hours ago

Shit, we've both been had!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 4 points 17 hours ago

Thank you for speaking my thoughts out loud

I once had a dog who liked to... idk he was a weird little shit, loved him. Anyway, I saw him chewing on something once, and he wouldn't "drop it". So I went to pull it out of his mouth and it was a string of some sort; and I proceeded to pull out like half a meter of string that he had (mostly) swallowed

I guess he was savoring the last few inches or whatever, but it was like a magic show where they pull handkerchiefs from their mouth

Anyhoo, thanks for coming to my TED Talk

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WandowsVista@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago
[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

i didnt get a PhD in order to not be able to argue with online strangers....

[–] Tmiwi@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Yep, not everyone is an armchair whatever. Some of us have specific knowledge in certain areas (through hard work) and like to counter misinformation.

Still get called armchair so and so's though...

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

You need a standing desk that way can be a standup whatever

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Main problem being anyone can pretend to be anything. It's why I leave my profession out of my comments and always link to sources. Not that it helps much

[–] Tmiwi@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Yes well I agree, my knowledge in my field isn't something I came up with, but it does allow me to point towards that knowledge so others may learn.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RAFAELRAMIREZ@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Priorities suddenly become crystal clear when it’s about winning an argument 😂

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago

Or you know.. like an actual pile of trash..

https://lemmy.world/post/44743107

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

motivation is a strong motivator.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, when I have to do long terms of intense comprehensive study I have to be in an ergonomic position and it's important to keep your blood sugar up so you don't feel lethargic.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 3 points 18 hours ago

Lmao this format is elite. I hope spaghetman overtakes angry chip dude (remote man, not ruffles zoom call)

load more comments
view more: next ›