this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
85 points (100.0% liked)

Uplifting News

18558 readers
867 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

Be wary of science by press releases.

In a mid‑stage study of high‑risk melanoma patients who had undergone surgery, the vaccine combined with Merck's Keytruda reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 49% after five years, consistent with the three-year follow-up data in 2023.

So, they had surgery, plus Ketruda.

@$200,000, few will be able to afford this and insurance will not cover it.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 6 points 6 hours ago

Only phase 2 trial, but still hopeful.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

49% reduction, customized to patient’s cancer, and $200k.

Cancer treatment can cost a lot more, so here’s hoping.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

This really puts a hole in "they aren't curing cancer because it's not profitable" argument. Insurance companies love cures because it's a lot cheaper for them to pay once than for ongoing treatment, when the only thing you're paying is the premium (and copay or whatever).

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 hours ago

Assuming they actually pay for treatment, which they will often try to avoid in as many ways as possible. Even delaying treatment is successful for insurance companies, as by the time all the paperwork is sorted and an insurance company finally agrees to pay for treatment, it can be too late.

What insurance companies love is not paying out money - for treatment or a cure.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 hours ago

no one said cure.

Cure is the most abused term in medicine.