this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
39 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8481 readers
254 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
39
BP loses head of EV charging as it accelerates pivot back to oil and gas (www.ft.com)
submitted 7 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Gift links to Financial Times articles like this one often have a view count limit. If it has run out, you can check archive.today for a copy or use the app version of the site. Be aware that archive.today sometimes modifies archived pages

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

O noes i wanted to like BP

[–] plyth@feddit.org 7 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

For which future does this make sense? BP should know what the elite is planning to do. The development to EV must be disrupted for this to make sense.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

BP have always paid lip service to EV & Renewables.

The political winds changing just give it an excuse to be more open about this.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

the problem is that the returns on renewables are lower than fossil fuels, as they can’t exploit us as much the share holders said to go back to oil and gas

i don’t really care about any legacy energy provider so this means nothing to me, they’ll be disrupted soon enough

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Yet, they can't exploit us yet.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 hours ago

Surprise surprise. O&G companies shove their noses in renewables only so they can wind them down. Same as car dealers using EVs to attract you so they can steer you towards fuel burners. For them, it's all about labelling things "green" and then greenwashing.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

Just in time for the second gas crunch.

[–] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 2 points 6 hours ago

neither the gift link nor the archive.ph link work for me.