this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

47725 readers
119 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Its always good to try!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thomasshikari@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

A Fairphone with GrapheneOS would be the tops

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

GrapheneOS doesn't like Fairphone very much it seems...

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (9 children)

what led you to this conclusion?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] viov@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Sure would be the toppiest of tops!

We can encourage them to work together in their official communication channels too!

Would be good for both of them on every level. GrapheneOS learning to make their own phones, and Fairphone learning to make an OS while both being partnered

Edit: Be the change you want to see everybody!! Flood the gates with what we want!

[–] illi@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Afaik Fairphone is not interested in implementing some security features that GrapheneOS people consider a deal breaker

[–] viov@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder why they don't want to, its not really in Fairphones to not do that

[–] skarn@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

They are talking about specific hardware features. Which would of course be great, but you can imagine how they are not exactly at the toppiest toppy top of Fairphone's priorities, when they are still struggling to be taken seriously by your mainstream Android buyer.

Consider that every hardware features is extra hard for Fairphone, on account of their very specific commitments to materials sourcing, labor practices, and longer term support.

They are a company with a lot of very complicated demands, for a still very low volume of sold devices. They need to pick their battles, and clearly being blessed by the church of Graphene can't be that high a priority.

[–] thomasshikari@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Graphene already has a partnership with Motorola now so the assumption is some time (I’ve seen 2027 speculated) we may get a Graphene Phone from Motorola. Mixed feelings about them partnering with a company like that but we’ll see how it goes. I still keep thinking about finally getting a secondhand pixel 10 so I can switch to Graphene from apple.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cdzero@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Fairphone do work with Ubuntu Touch.

[–] Zeiram@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Really? I have PostmarketOS on my Fairphone. No audio and really slow WiFi. This is unusable.

[–] viov@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Wait really? Ooo I have to check that out. Thanks!

[–] peterhorvath@mastodon.de 2 points 1 month ago

@cdzero @viov Btw, Ubuntu mobile is long ceased to exist, what is this ubuntu touch thing now?

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I remember the GrapheneOS team saying that they won't bring their OS to Fairphone, because the Fairphones don't bring hardware support for security measures the GrapheneOS team doesn't want to compromise on.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Definitely feels like a supply chain issue on parts for Fairphone to have this position. Hopefully Fairphone, GrapheneOS, and hardware venders can work this out on a later model.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

Switching my fairphone to e/os today

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago

EU petition?

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The short term is forked android. The long term is a Linux distribution, new or otherwise. It doesn't seem reasonable to assume that the proprietary blobs in Android will get reverse engineered.

[–] nooch@lemmy.vg 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Free Software Foundation is actively working on this (reverse-engineering Android proprietary blobs, see Librephone project). It hasn't even been a year yet since they began, but I'm rooting for them.

[–] viov@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That will definitely be the focus. If Europe people can mandate making Android and Apple Ecosystems be opened to having real GNU/Linux or anything else they want to be able to be put on it then that would make huge changes to getting that to happen

[–] Stupendous@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Ya. Short term Motorola for Graphene, long term any that support postmarketos

[–] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Hardware should be software agnostic

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 1 points 1 month ago

Exactly. This was less important before the internet got ubiquitous, but nowadays, when manufacturers can screw you remotely, it's very important.

This kind of vertical integration, where a single entity controls both hardware and software shouldn't exist.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] parson0@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

And I encourage everyone to write to banks and other service providers to provide apks directly or through F-Droid

load more comments
view more: next ›