Is there an available list of whos on it? Because they should be getting ready.
this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
70 points (98.6% liked)
News
37658 readers
1619 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
We can use Trump's memorandum from December as a guide:
The memorandum identifies “anti-Christian,” “anti-capitalism” or “anti-American” views as potential indicators that a group or person will commit domestic terrorism.
The memorandum claims that political violence originates with “anti-fascist” groups that hold the following views: “support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.”
Source: Labeling dissent as terrorism: New US domestic terrorism priorities raise constitutional alarms
So anyone who isn't a Christian, capitalist, fascist, racist, homophobe, transphobe, and misogynist will be classified as a potential terrorist and subject to anti-terrorist actions.
One can only hope that justice finds him and deals with him as soon as possible. I'd even take heavenly justice if worldly does not work.
Trump is picking a very interesting time to want to sick the military and his Gestapo on the US population, given how bogged down the military is in Iran and how desperately he wants to esculate it into a full blown ground invasion.
His German idol also made the mistake of declaring infinite wars too. Let's see how this strategy plays out for him and the rest of MAGA. Especially when the US military is already extremely demoralized, unlike the German military was.
Don't forget, Drumpf is the lifetime appointee to the Board of Peace, which has multiple countries donating billions of dollars and tens of thousands of troops to its agenda.
Pedonald is just bringing America to its knees, so when he leaves, America won't be a threat to him and his autocratic/aristocratic allies.
I wouldn't say the military is bogged down in Iran. It is an intractable mess that will kill millions with fuel shortages, but personnel-wise it's a very light conflict for the US. I would say that it is an active choice to embrace the downfall of the global economic system in favor of the bourgeoisie stealing one last payout from the working class, though.
Text of the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
It has always bothered me that the First Amendment says nothing about the Executive Branch doing these things (such as via Executive Order), only Congress.
Well, the Founders naively assumed that the official with the responsibility of executing the laws would also have to follow them. Somehow, our Originalist Supreme Court didn't get the memo .
It doesn't say anything about that because the president doesn't have the power to make laws, only Congress has that power.
SCOTUS: What the founders really mean by this was only Republicans are allowed to. No one else. They didn't write it down because it was just obvious at the time.
I wonder how long until they declare democrats (politicians, registered voters) enemies of the state.
Scary, crazy times.
They practically have already, without using the word ‘Democrat’. Read the EO from Sept 2025 where anyone who isn’t pro-Capitalism, pro-Christian, pro-nuclear family, pro-Fascist, and pro-American hegemony was declared an enemy of the State.
No really, read it and ask yourself who it describes and why. I know I recognized more than enough to know where I stand when I read it.
Common threads animating this violent conduct include anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.
re-reading [support for the overthrow of the United States Government]... that could totally be used to prosecute the 2026 and 2028 Big Lie deniers... including those who intend to certify the election.
Fun fact: One can read extremism on migration, race, and gender both ways. Just saying.
Poorly written laws ( and executive orders, etc. ) are a feature not a bug.
If it's open to interpretation, it can be changed to suit their needs in the moment
No, it’s obvious that they define extremism here to mean „the left wants to support gender identity, immigrants,… and that’s bad“ but one can also easily read it as „the right fights against these things and that’s bad is bad“.
I don’t think that’s what they wanted. Unless they want a reason to also fight their own if needed to keep them in line. But there are usually even easier reasons…
Now imagine if the next president was really left and said "we'll use this law" what Fox and company would say.
~~Has Fox~~ Have conservatives ever been concerned with being hypocritical?
There's no reason to expect this to be interpreted with an accurate description of "left" and "right".
My point isn't to say that this will be used to accurately target right wing extremists, but to say that this will be used against anyone oppositional to the state regardless of specific ideology or alignment
I'm not scared, not even a little bit. Some pedophile traitor's words hold little bearing on me. I'm someone who has actually given something to this country. I'll not be intimidated by a fat fucking garbage billionaire scum fuck.
Every government says this kind of thing after attacks, but it’s always unsettling how quickly language meant for “counterterrorism” starts sounding limitless once fear and politics get mixed together.
I have quite the ego. So I am blessed to not live in a world with people like you and you are cursed to exist in a world without people like me? Sign me up.
That this comment promoting the site hasn't been removed by S*ez inc is sus af