I'm going to rightfully assume you're asking this out of bad faith.
this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
-8 points (27.8% liked)
Asklemmy
54346 readers
112 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
There are three types of people:
It's not my thing, but I can respect the patience and skill it takes to make preserves. Home made jam is often better than store bought, so I expect the same applies to self preserved fruits etc.
Sugar is used as a preservative but until you make your own jam you have no conception of how much sugar is used, jam is just jelly for adults.
Its equal parts weight of the fruit and the sugar, generally.
But it tastes amazing!
I made jam once . Raspberry. After realizing it was like 3 or 4 cups (?) of sugar per 1 cup of mashed berries cooked down. I tried to find alternative ways to doing it. I used 1/3 less sugar and substituted with Splenda.
It was a very tart jam though still edible.
Probably won't ever make it again. I don't recommend trying to use less sugar to make it healthier.
I just happened to live somewhere with a bunch of raspberry bushes then.
It's not cheap to do it either. Cheaper than store bought. Probably . But probably not by much. Sugar, jars, lids, and pectin.
And if the fruit ain't free, it's definitely not cheaper than store bought.
In my learned opinion, they are very similar, in multiple aspects, to people who are pro-breathing.
I have no idea what you're asking. Self-preservation is fundamental to life. Not being "pro-self preservation" would be to be suicidal, at least passively.
What do you mean by pro-self preservation?
uhhhh it's a spectrum,
At its healthiest, self-preservation can mean:
setting boundaries, avoiding unnecessary risk, saving money, protecting mental health, leaving harmful situations, thinking long-term, resisting pressure to self-sacrifice for approval.
But self-preservation can also become limiting if it turns into:
chronic fear, emotional isolation, refusal to trust anyone, avoiding all vulnerability, stepping on others to stay secure, never taking meaningful risks.
Isn't that just evolutionary developed instinct? I can't imagine there would be anybody who's not pro-self preservation on those terms.
If it involves genocide, fuck the genocidal, religioethnonationalists.
Self preservation is a natural high priority instinct in all organisms so most people are fairly pro about it and any few that are not will not last long enough to comment here. If you are referring to cryogenics when you say self preservation then I regard that as just a slightly desperate and unscientific example of the instinctual self preservation I mentioned first.