this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
96 points (96.2% liked)

politics

29789 readers
1821 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 30 minutes ago

The draft never left, that’s what the Selective Service is and all men in the US are required to be part of it at 18.

The Service is supposed to be turned off when we are done with the draft.

[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Be woke: https://usmilitary.com/from-18-to-45-a-comprehensive-look-at-us-military-draft-ages/

They will push this shit, after they raised the age, and political dissidents will go to the war front. See Russian playbook.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 79 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (4 children)

Do these people have zero foresight at all? Or are they just impressively willingly ignorant?

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 10 points 3 hours ago

Turns out there's not even a correlation between being rich and being smart.

Also, America is hella propagandized.

[–] Arrandee@lemmy.world 47 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 hours ago

A quarter of a billion Spotify dollars buys a whole lot of ignorance.

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Paid millions by russia to sow division. They are enemies of the people

[–] DavorS@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago

i was waiting for someone to blame russia instead of usa tech oligarchs, late stage capitalist lobbies and aipac money...

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 78 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck you Joe, this is what you tricked people into voting for.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Don't remove people's agency. Joe isn't some evil mastermind he's just a meathead with a microphone. All those people chose to listen to him of their own free will.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 26 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You can both hate the meat microphone for echoing support and hate the meat sheep for following instructions.

[–] o0evillusion0o@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

You're right. I do hate everyone.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Joe isn't some evil mastermind he's just a meathead with a microphone. All those people chose to listen to him of their own free will.

Don't remove Joe's either. He's in a situation of his own making.

He chose to be a dumbass meathead who promoted every dumbass grifter that came by and gave him some money to his dumb as shit gullible audience. He cultivated the intellectually incurious as his core audience, then proceeded to shove far right propagandists in their face.

We all knew this would happen, and he was more than happy to support these people until it started having real negative effects. I hope Joe enjoys the products of his career. Namely, being associated with bringing trump to power. I hope he never gets to live it down

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

i do not care what joe rogan thinks, says, or does any more than I care what a

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 28 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If only there had been some way to know that Trump would do all this back in 2024.

[–] Ariselas@piefed.ca 30 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

If only there had of been some sort of document that people could have read.

pzKx1AKdpTv9UNv.jpg

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Does this talk about drafting citizens to war?

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 3 points 2 hours ago

Not as far as I know, I think the only reference to the draft was this one:

The Army no longer reflects national demographics to the degree that it did before 1974, when the draft was eliminated.

There is a bunch of other stuff in there though about military recruitment in high schools, and all high schoolers taking the military entrance exam (ASVAB).

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago

But I can’t read. :’(

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 31 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

This guy is so dense he doesn't get that these people are all chickenshit assholes who have other people fight for them.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

He's so dense he makes singularities look like amateurs.

Right? He's so dense he went from hawking propaganda to hawking radiation!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What?!

Like, yeah, rogan is dumb as fuck....

But he's telling them that they should go if they're doing a draft because he knows they won't

For fucks sake man, how did you not get that immediately?

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, now he does, but he's been talking about these folks as if they were normal people for a while now; they are not contributing anything except hate, they do not have good intentions, they are not for the people. They are fakers, liars, grifters, leeches, vampires and he supported them through and through.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's not that what you're saying is false, it's that there's no logical connection to the discussion....

Like you're just saying random things about the subjects of discussion, with no regard to topic

Like, if I said Starlink was causing satellite pollution, and you replied "Elon got his dick mangled trying to make it bigger"...

Even if true, it's just derailing any attempt at conversation, and who really knows if it's true?

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If you want to waste time having a discussion about this monkey go right ahead.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

If you want to waste time having a discussion about this monkey go right ahead

Even this...

Valid point that this is a waste of time, but if you hadn't typed that it would already be over.

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

Ranting on the internet is easier than going out on a street corner nowadays and I don't even have to wear the foil hat :P

[–] iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Exactly the money causes them to be dainty and proper, come hang in slums, we show you how its done

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 hours ago

Joe Rogan doesn’t get to pretend he’s on the other side now and I wish someone would say that to his stupid fuck face

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago

By cultivating radical individualism conservatives shoot themselves in the foot. In their vision of freedom any obligation on the citizen is an outrage.

America is weak.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 hours ago

Who knew that voting in Peter Thiel's Protegé would bring about a billionaire surveillance society and call for a draft in service of them (and for the rest of the Epstein class, of course).

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 hours ago

Funny how someone like joe has stuck to his guns better than someone like alex jones