Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.
Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!
How long until Supreme Court rules this unconstitutional?
California has had paid medical leave since 1946 and paid family leave since 2002, so there's already precedents.
SCROTUS has already established that precedent means nothing to them.
President over precedent, they rule.
Or standing for that matter.
Correct. Those POS are doing whatever the fuck they want. They should meet with a guillotine.
Fun fact: the only reason the supreme court has authority is because they said they do. And people have followed the norm of listening.
Sort of. Marbury v. Madison did establish "judicial review", but the Constitution did already specify that "The judicial Power shall extend to [...] the Laws of the United States". Marbury was really the test case that demonstrated this power.
And yes, people followed the norm, which is how all of society operates, on norms and trust.
I'm pretty sure the current president did away with following norms.
They may have meant the state Supreme Court since that's who struck down the redistricting so California law or precedent doesn't matter.
Unless it goes federal, but SCOTUS is rouge so who knows
Just long enough for Virginia to spend a significant part of their budget on implementing it.
Elections have consequences, Virginia. As you can see, sometimes good consequences too.
So universal healthcare, except not universal (only people employed by a company with more than 10 employees)...
Gotta keep the means checking. If you can't work because you're sick with cancer, where is your employer funded insurance?
Fucking idiots can't see the whole picture. Don't understand economies of scale. Probably don't know how much of their employers total compensation package is your insurance (my employer splits costs 60/40. They pay 30k/yr and I pay 20k, family plan).
They just want to set up benefits so that the indigent don't get any support. How very Christian of them.
It's not universal health care at all though. It just means you still get paid some portion of your regular salary when you take sick leave. The health care costs are still there.
Fucking idiots can’t see the whole picture. Don’t understand economies of scale.
From what I've been reading about it in "dying of whiteness" it's not that they don't understand. They understand. Conservatives just don't want the outgroups (eg: black people) to benefit. That's it. They'd rather die themselves.