this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
61 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

6708 readers
201 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have no idea how anyone can look at our mess in the US and think, "yeah, that's what we need".

[–] thomasshikari@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

What do you mean? I think we’re doing great. Sure, it’s tough to afford to live and there seem to be more people walking along the sides of the highways than before, but I think we’re moving in the right direction. /s

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The government is on board with this system. With a revolving door between regulators and regulated, and corporate lobbying, the interests of investors prevail over those of users. Welfare policy must now be filtered through the private sector lens.

I think this is the problem. A shitty regulator with poor governance. Not necessarily privatisation in general.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Not necessarily privatisation in general.

Oh, I think it's both, in such a case, because - and this is just logic - when the organization providing a human service is beholden first to shareholders and the salary needs of big CEOs, the service provided to the people suffers in that back seat.

This has been proved repeatedly and consistently.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

It is really hard for a government agency to switch from self performing to contracting and it requires a very different skill set in setting up contracts and regulations. Hell, it can be very difficult for government agencies to switch between different kinds of contracting.

And usually, it requires very intelligent people and it is hard to keep intelligent people in these roles on government pay.