this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
409 points (98.6% liked)

memes

21419 readers
2522 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

The fun part is 2019 was already trash 😂

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"..and they voted him in again!! Yeah! All 'cos of the price of eggs!! I shit you not!"

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

And, the Epstein files revealed he raped a 13 year old child, but MAGA still loves him. And, then he bombed Iran, and doubled the price of gas, but MAGA still loves him. There are troops deployed all over America, entering homes without warrants, dragging families into the streets, and MAGA still loves him. ICE officers are raping underage girls in concentration camps and getting them pregnant, and MAGA still loves him.

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

But but… both sides are the same!!!!

/s

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thanks for cropping it before she starts violently puking. I saw it, it's gross

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I hadn't seen the original video. Without that context, I thought the girl on the right was chuckling. Now, I guess she was retching.

Edit: Maybe rather than saying she went from "chuckling" to "retching", I should have said she went from "chuckling" to "up-chuckling".

[–] Emotional_Engi@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't worry, it's almost impossible to find it. At least I couldn't find trying reverse image search.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Emotional_Engi@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

Me too. But every single video I found is edited.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

Okay but that'd make the gif even better

[–] Klear@piefed.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You should have labeled them 2033 / 2026. It would have made you look like a prophet in 7 years, if the internet was still usable at that time.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Funny in the same way as when normie Americans talking about the 2028 election like they still have a democracy.

Trump's built a bunker and people still refuse to face the fact that they're at the "watering the tree of liberty" phase and have been for years.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The dominion voting machine company was bought by a Republican business man. It's now called "Liberty Vote". Those machines are used in more than half the states, and their counting function which is used to count votes gets "calibrated" before the count. That calibration (eg. What sample cards return votes for what parties) determines who wins.

At the same time, security researchers, federal advisories and election experts have documented software vulnerabilities and real-world procedural failures that could be exploited if safeguards and chain-of-custody practices break down

Most election‑security experts highlighted to journalists and in formal letters that the riskiest failures are procedural: poor chain-of-custody, lax physical security, careless software updates and insider actions

https://factually.co/fact-checks/technology/are-dominion-voting-machines-reliable-can-data-be-manipulated-c78d7a

Anyways I'm sure Trump isn't capable of breaking down safeguards \s

[–] MrQuallzin@pie.eyeofthestorm.place 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm confused what conspiracy you're trying to sell here. From your AI source:

no credible evidence, however, has been produced showing large‑scale, remote or systemic vote‑flipping by Dominion machines in national elections, and routine audits and paper trails are the practical defense that has verified results in contested contests

Security experts say something could happen in very specific scenarios if safeguards broke down. That sounds just like any other high profile company, so not sure what makes them different. From what I've read since they were bought, there haven't been any actual instances of tampering and they've had clean audits.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

An intentional corruption of the election processes.