No thanks, the vibe code slop is super apparent
this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
41 points (83.6% liked)
Open Source
47209 readers
216 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
how do you tell?
They're writing whole paragraphs in their commit messages. What dev would even write that much documentation at all? And then into the git message? https://codeberg.org/vitali87/croft/commits/branch/main?page=2
The fact that there is this section in the README even though all the code has docstrings and you can generate the docs is certainly interesting.
The readme is gigantic with weird info like keybinds and project layout, especially the bizarre "what works" status section and the mention of number of unit tests.
if it ain't stated front and center that this project wasn't vibeshat, you can safely assume it is.
On one hand it has treesitter and has a builtin optional modal mode with Vim shortcuts. On the other hand it is VSCode. On the side above it, it is a terminal application. And one more side is, it is written in Rust. Cursed, through and through.
On a more serious note, this is more than just an alternative. Its the bridge between VSCode people and those who want to try working in a terminal. I think this is actually a really good idea.
Finally, vim2.
This looks awesome, gotta give it a try.
This might be fire for phone usage with Termux 👀
it is pretty snappy
Something something full circle lol