this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
458 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

85208 readers
3953 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Good thing I don't personally pay them anything

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Oh, you are going to pay. The bubble is going to fuck us all quite thoroughly.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 24 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly Google is likely to beat openAI and Anthropic as things are.

OpenAI and Anthropic have to buy/rent their hardware from Nvidia, while Google is making their own TPU hardware. Google's hardware costs on AI is way lower, every dollar they spend on it goes a lot farther.

And unlike the other two, they're already a profitable company. They're making record profits right now. They don't have a desperate need to figure out how to make back billions on their AI models, they can just keep offering Gemini at a comparatively cheap price and wait for anthropic and open AI to bankrupt themselves.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I really really really don't want evil corporation Google to dominate even more.

I prefer plailny greedy corporations over evil ones

[–] ChromaticMan@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

OpenAI and Anthropic aren’t less evil than Google.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

They aren't great, though I do think Google is worse. And far too powerful

[–] some_guy 27 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's gonna come crashing down pretty soon. It's gonna hurt all of us. It won't hurt the people responsible nearly enough.

[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 1 points 12 minutes ago

pretty soon

people have been saying that for some time though

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 67 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

reminder than during 2019 there were streaming services popping left and right, all showing tremendous growth because they started from zero, and articles were about how bad Netflix was doing due to having practically no growth compared with the competition (they already had a massive subscriber base). Twist? Netflix was the only streaming service that was actually making a profit, the rest were a massive loss but big growth.

Needless to say most of those streaming services died; who remembers DC streaming service, or Yahoo's? While Netflix is basically as stong as ever, despite the prevalent enshitification happening through the whole industry.

Point of the story? shareholders don't care about stable profitable business, only cancerous growth. AI is like that, zero profits, ton of cost, but as long as they show growth the shareholders are happy, regardless of how cooked the books are.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

2019 Yahoo

My immediate thought, there is no way Yahoo! Screen survived into 2019.

I looked it up and Yahoo! Screen (which featured Community season 6) was shutdown in January 2016. But Yahoo! View launched in late 2016 (as a Hulu-like replacement), and that did shutter in mid 2019.

So Yahoo! was already dead, but it also died for real in 2019.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine having a streaming service so bad it fails twice

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't that kind of Yahoo!'s business model?

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Actually, when Yahoo was the search giant, before Google went mainstream, they were pretty damn good at what they did.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 minutes ago

With how shit Google is these days, I kinda wonder if Yahoo could dust out their search engine from two decades back and it would just be... better.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Netflix was also late to streaming because their mail service subscriptions were THE major player

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Late to streaming? Netflix was the first big time streaming service that I ever heard of. The main reason their streaming service was able to take off like it did is that nobody else of significance thought that streaming was worth pursuing. What other companies were offering streaming services at anything approaching scale before Netflix?

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

YouTube and Hulu were basically all starting about the same time. But RealPlayer was the first big one.

Netflix just had the layout that everyone uses now. The Cable networks had streaming services, just not on demand. YouTube and Hulu also pioneered the on demand layout. YouTube focused on personal experiences so maybe that's why you're forgetting them

late to streaming, but practically the first subscription based system to watch movies/tv online.

First years of Netflix were the best, the product began degrading quite early on. but that was mostly companies realizing that instead of licensing their content on Netflix, they can make their own platforms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 38 points 13 hours ago
[–] Steve@startrek.website 14 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

How much do they spend when I pay nothing?

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think they might've broken the laws of math there, as they're certainly still spending a non-zero amount.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works 128 points 17 hours ago (10 children)

Of course it is, it’s essentially a scam. They just need enough humans to keep investing until they check out and run with a bailout.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

thats why they are peddling it to governments for "surveillance AI"

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't get why companies get to legally bailout like this. Why do people have to suffer for their bullshit? Enslave the CEOs if you have to make things right, leave the people out of it.

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's simple, because the people making laws and overseeing the adherence to those laws are great buddies with those same CEOs.

So, corruption.

Though i do agree with you, there is no such thing as too big to fail. Government shouldn't have any handouts to corporations.

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

These levels of corruption are frustrating; money shouldn't decide the law.

No handouts to corporations, indeed. Make them pay.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 39 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Funny thing is, the US government doesn't even have nearly enough money to bail all these mfa out. So we are heading into uncharted territory here

[–] OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works 32 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Of course they don’t, that’s why they’re building bunkers. Thinking it’ll slow us down, as we’ll open their bunkers like cans of tuna. A bunker only works for so long, then the survivors start hunting for them like delicious shipwrecks.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

they are going to argentina. apparently NZ has blocked thiels compound.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

That's not good business

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 48 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

they are spending infinite money for every $1 i pay them

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

spending money that nvidia gave them via chips

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›