3DPrinting

22877 readers

319 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
Do not create links to reddit
If you see an issue please flag it
No guns
No injury gore posts

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

j4k3@lemmy.world

andypiper@lemmy.world

GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip

Multi-material joints (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 22 hours ago by agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works to c/3dprinting@lemmy.world

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been thinking about print-in-place joints, and playing with my new multi-head printer.

Has anyone been playing around with making one half of a joint from PLA and the other from PETG to get snugger PIP joints? Seems like that would be a good way to get real right tolerances without bonding.

I did a casual search and I couldn't find anyone talking about it.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] yamper@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago

ive done this on small parts with an AMS and it works well for snug joints, except on a single-nozzle setup the contamination weakened the part too much. if you have multiple nozzles, this is a great idea IMO

[–] HelloRoot@lemy.lol 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I think the interface will be difficult to print. If the underside is smooth, the non sticking material might not stay in place. If the underside is rough ... well then you have a joint with at least one rough spot in it's rotation. Thats just from thinking about my experience with using pla with petg supports (and vice versa) so it may be better than I expect. Depending on the usecase, I think it might work.

But I think it's easier to print a joint in place from a single material and then "snap" it so it moves. Or design something where you print the parts seperately and then assemble.

[–] clb92@feddit.dk 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If you print really, really slow, I think it could be done without too many problems.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 41 minutes ago

That's what I'm thinking, wonder if I can isolate joints themselves in the slicer to just show down for those parts