this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
-60 points (5.9% liked)

politics

30109 readers
2778 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The Atlantic has taken a rather weird turn lately.

Are they now simping for data centers?

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The Atlantic is owned by Emerson Collective, which is a venture capitalist firm founded by Laurene Powell Jobs - Steve Jobs' widow.

They invest in "companies in energy and environment, artificial intelligence, digital health, fintech, education, work and media."

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

So clearly biased and hypocritical on the topic of data centers.

Stop wrecking our water, air, quiet, and wildlife!

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

The Atlantic is owned by Steve Job’s widow…

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago

The Atlantic has a partnership with openai. I cancelled my subscription.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No it isn't. They are a drain on society. They do not produce any useful gain.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Sounds like something a datacenter would say...

[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 7 points 5 days ago

The Atlantic used to be a great read, I still think about their article on Captain Crunch back in the days and how excited it got me about phreaking again.

Long live the blue box.

But fuck this new editorial direction.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This is the scenario playing out in my head:

Big Tech hotshot: the protests are becoming serious. A general opinion is forming. People really don't want this. But I want this, my companies need this. And all the government support & funding, yummy!

The Atlantic: Right, and we get some of that sweet moulah. We need to create consent. Lemme see what we can do - hmm, how about roundabout dismissing legitimate concern as being overblown, calling it a panic? Concern trolling basically. Crude, but it has worked before.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

The Atlantic: "Watch us put a loaded shotgun in our mouth and tell everyone this is fine."