Political Memes
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
Some of them don't know. One of my favorite jokes goes like this:
I work in a vacuum cleaner factory. My wife could use a vacuum cleaner, so I decided to take a different part home every day, so that eventually, I could build her a vacuum cleaner at home. But no matter how I assemble the parts I took, I always end up with a submachine gun.
It's from a German short film on napalm called The Inextinguishable Fire. Very short, worth a watch. Holds up.
Ask Ukrainians.
They are thinking"if we don't they will" which is the same reason why we have so many nukes in the world now
"if we don’t they will"
They aren't wrong tho...
Do you have any evidence whatsoever 'the bad guys' were developing GAN AI based image recognition drones despite the extremely low ability for low powered image recognition models to accurately identify toast, much less people in camouflage in a crowded visual environment?
Do you have any evidence
This isn't open source software project where everyone knows what's happening. This is the exact opposite. Neither I would share existence of the tech, nor would they
Except one side actively, happily, one could say gleefully shared they were making a doomsday weapon with effectively indiscriminate targeting.
Si vis pacem, para bellum. If you want peace, prepare for war. If there's a belligerent opponent eyeing you, your best way to ensure peace is to make sure they know it'll hurt to attack you. If you look weak then they'll have no reason to not invade. It sucks that things are this way, but it's been true for as long as humans have desired something from another. This applies from a schoolyard bully to a bellicose nation.
That's why I never leave home without my napalm and child flaying device.
Ukraine are fighting for their survival. You can't put someone's back to the wall and expect them to make the most moral, clear-headed, rational decisions.
What they have right now is Western armaments and funding. What they don't have is an inexhaustible supply of manpower. And their enemy has a much bigger supply of manpower than they do. Developing more and better autonomous weapon systems is the most rational choice in the horrendous situation they've been placed in.
The ultimate moral responsibility here is not with Ukraine. If the world had taken Russia seriously as a threat when they took Crimea, if we had moved to provide serious and meaningful security guarantees to Ukraine and apply meaningful, effective punishments to Russia (like dumping their oil and gas, as we finally, begrudgingly started to do in 2022), none of this would have happened. Instead we threw them to the wolves, and now you're here wagging your finger at them for defending themselves any way they can.
No, it's still stupid. We're gonna be really unhappy when drones with AI start indiscriminately killing people. Doesn't have to be in the Russia/Ukraine war.
I hate to break it to you but the development of AI weapon systems was always an inevitability. It has been an inevitability since the first ape hit another ape with a rock.
Now we can decide, collectively, that we don't want to permit the use such weapons. I'd certainly support such a decision. We can treat them like nuclear weapons, something that should be too dangerous to contemplate using. We can work to put in place international safeguards against their use. Those would be good goals to work towards. But they didn't suddenly spring into existence because of some guy in Ukraine, and acting like they did is ignorant and asinine.
If you're under the impression that this is, somehow, a one-sided development on Ukraine's part - that Russia, along with every other major military power in the world, is not currently racing to develop their own autonomous weaponry - then you either have an insanely optimistic view of the world, or you're a Russian propagandist. The only reason Ukraine is the first country we've heard of using such weapons is because they're in such a desperate situation that deploying untested military hardware directly into battle makes sense. One of the key advantages they've been able to hold over the Russians is how rapidly they iterate on their technology, but that advantage comes from an approach of building small production runs, testing them directly in the field and then reviewing the results. They do this with their drones, with their anti-drone defenses, and everything else besides. It's not a safe, careful, thoughtful way of doing things, but it is effective, and when you're facing total annihilation you will always choose effective over safe.
If you want to stand up for the idea that autonomous weapons are too dangerous to be allowed to exist, you won't hear any disagreement from me. But if all you want to do is wag your finger at people fighting for their lives then you really to stop and consider whether this comes from a place of genuine concern for the world, or just a need to feed your own sense of moral superiority.
Everyone can be doing it, and it's a stupid idea. They're not mutually exclusive. Fully autonomous AI weapons might be a bigger threat to humanity's existence than even nuclear weapons.
They're thinking "Russia has far more men than we do so we need to even the odds".
This comic is an absurdly naive take.
What a naive position of comfort you're posting from 🤣