this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
357 points (99.7% liked)

News

38095 readers
1835 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Attorneys for Donald Trump are telling a federal judge to back off her tentative attempts to look into the mechanics of a settlement that purported to create a controversial $1.776 billion "anti-weaponization fund" for the president's allies and supporters.

In January, Trump's original lawsuit against the IRS was filed in the Southern District of Florida. By the middle of May, however, the case was closed – on the plaintiff's own request – with the 45th and 47th president opting instead for a publicly subsidized fund that would reward pro-Trump stalwarts and others similarly situated.

Under the terms of the settlement, eligible claimants are people who were subjected to the "sustained use of the levers of government power by Democrat elected officials, political and career federal employees, contractors, and agents in order to target" them for "improper and unlawful political, personal, and/or ideological reasons."

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 135 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Waitwaitwaitwaitwait. I'd always been reading the rounded figure of $1.8 billion. It was specifically $1.776 billion?

I hate this fucking country right now; jesus christ.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago

Actually, the settlement itself doesn't set a cap. They're saying 1.776 bulilli9n, but it's actually unlimited funds for Trump and his minions.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're talking about the people that thought epic fury made them sound tough

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Wait a minute. It wasn't Epic Furry?

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago

For his stupidity and crimes he should be fined

$6,942,067,800,813.50

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What is the significance of 1.776 billion over 1.8?

[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The US declared independence in 1776. It's an important symbolic number for the country.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right, so it's a dogwhistle to independence. Thanks for clarifying!

[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean, I'm not sure I'd call it a "dogwhistle". American independence is usually seen as a good thing, even if it is currently being co-opted by Trump for his bullshit.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

January 6 insurrectionists were saying that January 6, 2021 will be another 1776. That's why this number is used here.

[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thanks - I didn't know about that context. That's fucked up, and definitely a dogwhistle.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah absolutely, the freedom itself isn't a dogwhistle, but using it for such a gross misuse of public funds is, is all I meant.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

1776 in the United States - Wikipedia https://share.google/U6reJSDH6n4EBePmQ

[–] Maiq@piefed.social 51 points 1 week ago

It's quite literally their responsibility to put checks on power! The entire reason we have three branches of government.

[–] Klox@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The court hasn't demonstrated any authority in decades. Start holding these criminals in contempt for fuck sake.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Isn't this the part where a bailiff gets to haul the sack of crap to a concrete and bars hotel room for a while, or is that exclusively reserved for us poors?

/rhetorical

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

Hey SCrOTUS, how do you feel about that? The monster you fucking created is no longer doing your bidding.

Muzzle your dog, dickweeds.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As long as Trump is sitting in the WH everything will get worse and there are less and less people "lawfully" standing in his way and it might be time for the people to take matters into their hands.

[–] TrippingBalls@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The larger issue is that the Trump Empire received immunity from IRS investigations

[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

What about SEC investigations? Like, into the empire of crypto scams they are running...

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, they didn't. They were told and you were told that they got immunity, but that's not actually how that works. Government workers say lots of things that are not actually backed by law, and are in fact false.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah the fun part about DOJ memos and a non impartial DOJ is the next AG can just write a memo saying "nuh-uh, Blanche has poopy pants and everything he wrote is wrong"

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

That'll get challenged too.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If this Attorneys DONT STOP Disobeying and SULLYING the Court then they're going to get VERY STERN and HAND SIGNED Letters soon!

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Do they even get letters anymore. I thought it was just raised eyebrows and wagging fingers.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

They don't want anyone to look too hard because a lot of that money is gone. Corruptly distributed through numerous corrupt companies by corrupt people in a corrupt manner.

Yeah, ok, you'll see some of it being dripfed out with a huge 'patriotic' fanfare. But most of it is already well hidden.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Judges love beeing told they don't have authority. It goes really well for attorneys that challenge the legitimacy of the court.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What's legalese for "Oh yeah? Try me, needledick."