this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
80 points (97.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

31959 readers
1157 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BambiDiego@lemmy.zip 5 points 19 hours ago

Jsus Christ its Json Brne!

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

In ever system I architect there is inevitability a MAT Daemon prominently used.

[–] genzboomer@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Oh man. Missed opportunity! I'll do that on my next mug!

S(😀) 2>&1 &

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Array Damon? Vector Damon? I don't get it.

[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I would say JSON Bourne but every member within the curlys needs to be a key value pair, so this isn't JSON.

[–] loweffortname@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Technically an empty array [] is valid JSON...so...

Proof:

[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

["🙂"] and [] and "🙂" are valid, but anything within {} needs to be a key value pair.

[–] loweffortname@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 21 hours ago

I genuinely saw [] and not {}...

Maybe I do need to schedule that eye exam.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 21 hours ago
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 19 hours ago

Jake Weary was better

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, {} should be [] so it would look something like this:

[""]

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Could double entendre it and do

[["😃", 0],
 [0, "😃"]]

For a JSON Bourne Identity

[–] genzboomer@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

He was always very forgetful, Mr. Bourne... and well spotted! 😉

[–] python@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Me neither, but I bet it's still valid JS syntax

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes. In JavaScript, Objects without explicit keys will use the value as the key. At least that’s how it works in Chrome devtools output. 🤷‍♂️

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 7 points 19 hours ago

This is insane, but ultimately, FAR from the most insane thing JavaScript has done to me this week, so I'll let it slide.

[–] InevitableWaffles@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sudo systemctl restart mattd.service

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, you're thinking of this guy:

Image of Jesus Christ. Hah, sorry, it's actually Ewan McGregor as Obi-Wan Kenobi, looking weirdly similar to common depictions of Jesus.

[–] executivechimp@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 17 hours ago

Hello there!

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago

That's a swede or something.

[–] HeyLow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 20 hours ago

It's Jason Bourne

[–] AstroLightz@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I'm out of the loop. Who is this?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

MHAT DHAAAAMAAAN

[–] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Now also print one onto a shell.