this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
74 points (98.7% liked)

politics

30187 readers
2636 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
JuBe@lemmy.world
Lasherz12@lemmy.world
74
Texas Jewish leaders object to “Judeo-Christian” Bible readings (www.texastribune.org)
submitted 7 hours ago by CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Meanwhile, the "nones" in the United States are at 28%. That's more than any other group.

When do they get some representation instead of constantly having to put up with xtian bullshit and their constant chest-thumping?

https://www.npr.org/2024/01/24/1226371734/religious-nones-are-now-the-largest-single-group-in-the-u-s

Of course, when xtians loooove to talk about "Judeo-Christian" whatever, they are almost always being disingenuous. That almost goes without saying. Jews are about 2.5% of the population; it's almost expected they are thrown a bone in such discourse and then mostly ignored.

What is absolutely stunning to me is that the 28% is ignored, almost constantly. And for a while, they were growing at nearly 1% per year, while xtians were dwindling about 1% per year....and yet, all we get to hear is about what the xtians want, how politicians can pander to these whiners even more, etc.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The reason for that, IMO, is that the "none" people are usually in the camp of "I don't practice any religion" vs "I despise every religion"; so it becomes like having a vegetarian option in a menu, it is good for the vegetarians and should not offend any reasonable omnivore.

The problem of course is the unfairness you point out, added to the fact that most religious people that get involved in these political fights are not in the "I am happy there is a vegetarian option for me", instead they are usually in the camp of "I am a vegetarian therefore YOU should not eat meat"

PS: the vegetarian vs omnivore comparison is just for examples, I know eating meat is bad for the environment and we should all reduce/eliminate it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Heh. I'm not entirely sure if the vegetarians or the omnivores are the nones here?

As a vegetarian, I've definitely been around the veg*ns that behave nearly exactly like the newly converted born-again xtians often tend to do. Obnoxious and sanctimonious, and I don't know who they convince by behaving like that...

Conversely, I have had to break bread with omnivores that insist that I should be eating meat. Some legitimately think vegetarianism is life-threatening ( 🤣 ), but also, since I'm a man, much of the concern seems to be that not eating meat might make me gay/womanly, which a certain type of individual finds just as terrifying, LOL.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 0 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Religious nones are mainly non-denominational Christians. Plenty of them attend a local non-denominational church, I'm sure.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2024/01/24/religious-nones-in-america-who-they-are-and-what-they-believe/

For example, fully 90% of religious “nones” say they seldom or never go to religious services.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 6 hours ago

So much for being sure.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Ok, that is more in line with what I imagined

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

so in Texas they don't even ask about other religions? basically if you are not "standard xtian" you are a "none"?

TIL Texas is even more backwards than I gave it credit for

[–] otterpop@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

We live in a representative democracy, and once those "none" candidates start winning, then they'll start pandering to that demographic. Thing is, proclaiming to be a "none" is still political suicide at the ballot box: https://news.gallup.com/poll/609344/felonies-old-age-heavily-count-against-candidates.aspx

Also, calling them Christians will not hurt you. You're a well spoken person so when you type xtian every time it's just perceived as an insult (at least by me) and isn't helping your discourse.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, I realize that atheists are still considered unelectable, especially because a certain part of the country still thinks that you cannot be moral without a belief in supernatural entity, preferably the god Jehovah/Yahweh/Allah from the Bible.

I have met and know many people who literally believe the only thing holding people back from things like murder is religious belief. I had a roommate tell me I should be happy he's a xtian because otherwise I'd be at risk of getting murdered for my belief - by him, apparently!

You’re a well spoken person so when you type xtian every time it’s just perceived as an insult (at least by me) and isn’t helping your discourse.

It's just shorthand. No one should be offended by the abbreviation - it has a long history started by the xtians themselves.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

"None" is only the largest category if you separate Catholics and Protestants. Some people on the internet might have strong opinions about that, but most silent majority Christians wouldn't make that distinction.

[–] otterpop@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Because the differences between Catholic or Protestant or Eastern Orthodox or non denominational Christians is miniscule when compared to the beliefs of an atheist. The broad category of Christians still hold a lot of similar beliefs to be true.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Well, they do have a tradition of murdering each other over those differences, so.... ¯\(ツ)/¯

But yes, I realize that when it is politically expedient to violate the rights of others, what tends to happen in the United States is that suddenly all these xtian groups do get lumped together to help fluff up the numbers.

Well, until they aren't - see the Defense Department excluding Mormons as being xtians, for example.