this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
227 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

85746 readers
4011 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Start selling Volvo's newest model... The Volvo Polestar

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 27 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I'm getting so tired of reading fucking "that should terrify you!" In headlines. We are all sufficiently fucking terrified shut the fuck up.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Just that type of headline that tells you how you should feel period. Thank you headline, I'm now annoyed. It's never any other emotion youre trying to force on me, just irritation or rage. That and the whole 'read that again'. Fuck off.

[–] Denixen@feddit.nu 3 points 6 hours ago

In our reverse world, the more hyperbolic the title is the less worthwhile content the article contains. Use this to filter out content that can be safely (ironically) ignored.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

100% I have enough actually traumatic things happening around me tyvm.

This is proof that you should never bend the knee or try to appease that facist state. Polestar moved production to the US and still got banned. They don't believe in non-zero sum economics, you will always be the loser even when both party's could win.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 29 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Why in the fuck can't I purchase a non connected vehicle?

[–] balp@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The main reason is safety; in many parts of the world, an automatic emergency call in case of an accident is mandatory. For this to be possible, the car needs to be connected. I know Russia, China, Japan, and the EU have these rules. I think it was mandatory in parts of the US as well, but I'm not sure.

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago

Who's safety though? The car owner that chooses to not have this system? The other driver that can choose whether or not to have such a system? The inanimate infrastructure that was involved in the accident?

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Slate Auto next year. Don't get the telematics module.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, but you can build yourself one.

/s

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

You can…until they come for the kits and older cars. It’s also expensive and takes a while, too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 105 points 1 day ago (26 children)

Being an American wanting an electric car must be a nightmare!
Not many options, and all of them are too expensive, because competition is stifled by keeping competition out with insane tariffs.

In Europe we are spoiled with choice, lots of European brands with lots of models, and we even have American although we don't want them, but we also have Chinese although they do have an EU import tax, to compensate for the Chinese subsidies.

But several Chinese brands are becoming quite popular, especially BYD and XPeng have become popular here in Denmark.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

In Europe we are spoiled with choice

Even more so in Australia, as we have zero tariffs, as the new EU trade agreement removed the small tarrif that was on EI cars, none on Chinese cars.

I have a BYD and charge off solar panels on my roof

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Awesome, we do that too, and haven't felt the increased oil/gas prices at all. 😎

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 6 points 13 hours ago

It’s almost as though Tesla is being granted a monopoly.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Hey just a friendly reminder those Chinese EVs are backdoored with an Elon style god mode like Tesla. Lots of modern cars have a similar issue but EVs get it bad. Tl;dr rip out your car's modem.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I bet all the new cars are unfortunately, my VW is also constantly connected to VW.
We need to make that shit illegal. Until then we have to live with it, just as with our smartphones.
I know I can install AOSP and get rid of it, and I did use that for years, but I just want the hassle anymore.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 4 points 7 hours ago

Not ALL but most yeah. It's partially just for data mining to make new cars more profitable but is also an easy way for spooks to RC a car

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it's extremely frustrating here. The EV market actively sucks with limited options and inflated prices. I also bought a used Polestar 2 last year, so now I'm extra frustrated.

My guess, however, is that PS just didn't care to deal with obtaining the waiver- the brand has sold poorly here in the US and they've been posturing to exit the market for a few years.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

For some reason Polestar doesn't seem to be doing as well as it deserves in many markets.
I hope you can have yours maintained as long as is required even if they leave the market.

It was a runner up when we bought our EV.

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

If they're priced the same as the US models, it's little wonder they're not selling well. MSRP for the P2 was ~70k USD which is a non-starter for most folks.

I got mine used at 4 years old with 74k miles on it (fortunately EVs generally tend to last towards 200k miles barring any other issues) for 20k, it's the only reason I could afford to buy it. Otherwise I was probably going to go with an ID.4 which was at a similar price point. What did you end up going with?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Here in Denmark a Polestar 2 is just below $50,000 excluding VAT but including all other taxes.
Competition in USA is absolutely destroyed by crazy tariffs.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

While it could be better. There's a lot of great deals on used EVs around 20k. Plus we have Lucid, which has the longest range of any ev in the world afaik.

If we had the Chinese EVs then the prices would be a lot more reasonable.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

I think the Mercedes beats it:

The Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ Sedan. Thanks to a massive 122 kWh (usable) battery pack and ultra-aerodynamic design, it achieves up to 926 km (575 miles) of range on the WLTP cycle.

But IDK for sure, because they use different measurements.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 12 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

It’s gets better. Even if you find an EV, the states tax you more than an ICE car. Texas has a $200 yearly fee to supposedly make up for lost gas tax revenue. But at 20c/gallon and assuming 30mpg, I’d have to drive 30,000 miles to offset that cost (only drove about 8,500 miles per year).

And now they want to do the same at the Federal level with another $150 tax (federal taxes are 18c/gallon), which would be another 25,000 miles.

So I would be taxed $350/year to offset “gas tax losses”, which would only even out for me if I were to drive 55,000 miles in a year.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I heard about that, and that's crazy. You gotta love all that freedom. 🤥
I don't drive nearly that much either.
I understand the logic of the tax on gas to pay for roads, but here an EV is taxed less because it pollutes less. USA needs more of that.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Realistically we should be taxing by weight and miles driven as the former causes the most damage to the roads. At that point the propulsion type and efficiency don’t really matter. EVs actually would be taxed more given that they’re heavier, but it’d also proportionately tax trucks and larger vehicles correctly at that point.

You could easily implement it with a yearly odometer reading with your registration or inspection and every car has a GVWR registered with it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Being an American wanting an electric car must be a nightmare! Not many options, and all of them are too expensive,

Chevy Bolt MSRP is $28,995.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

I'm waiting to see if Slate can hit their crazy $24,950 target base price. With a 65kWh battery, that's a pretty great price. That's almost cheaper than buying batteries alone. I'm wondering if it will be able to do home backup power.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Buy a Polestar and change the badge. Twits who can't explain the difference, will never know the difference.

[–] pageflight@piefed.social 45 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security denied Polestar an authorization under the current Connected Vehicle Rule to sell cars in the U.S. from model year 2027 on. That’s because Polestar is a subsidiary of Geely, a Chinese automaker. Ironically, Polestar’s sister brand, also owned by Geely, Volvo, was granted the authorization in May.

What's the Connected Vehicle Rule? From the Bureau of Industry and Security (is that a thing?):

On January 14, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued a rule restricting the import and sale of certain connected vehicles and related hardware/software linked to China or Russia. BIS determined these transactions pose national security risks, as companies from these countries may be compelled to share data or allow remote access to connected vehicles in the United States.

So, the reported ban seems capricious, but I wouldn't mind one solution: stop making cars connected. The key fob uses its local protocol for lock/unlock and remote start, my phone uses bluetooth for charge controls and status, and there's a scren that uses Android Auto. Car companies stop trying to write UX and network stacks.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yea but then they couldn't harvest and sell your data

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 hours ago

also can be a pain, Toyota doesn't have connected services, so you need to take your car into Toyota Australia for a recent recall software update, manufacturers with connected services just do an OTA update.

As an Australian I couldn't give a shit about China spying on me, I do care if my own country spies on me. I own a BYD

[–] Shartyfartblast@piefed.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

TIL Volvo is a subsidiary of a Chinese company

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago

Me looking at my 2023 Polestar 2 LRDM:

"It's ok. They can't hurt you. You parked next to a 240i and you felt superior remember?"

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Arbitrary actions are arbitrary.

I'm not terrified by that, just disgusted.

My guess is that the ulterior motive is to protect Tesla. Their competitors almost all offer better quality, and increasingly there are entrants to the market that produce those higher-quality vehicles at far lower cost. Musk seems unable or unwilling to take corrective actions, instead trying to buy the regulators.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not arbitrary, as your second paragraph suggests there are other reasons. Someone didn't pay off the administration. It really is like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 3 points 15 hours ago

Cant they just sell them as Volvos?

load more comments
view more: next ›