this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
166 points (99.4% liked)

politics

30208 readers
2234 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 52 minutes ago

Of course they know it exists. Their decisions show they like it and want more of it.

This miserable headline makes it clear the media is part of the problem, gaslighting people and trying to cover Supreme Court's racism with ignorance.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

I feel like they made it clear (that that's what they think) many times before. Is this one even worse?

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

I am a dipshitted 20th century racist.

I spend 30 or 32 years being a leftist and thinking that because I could point out everyone else's racism I must not be racist.

Well fuck me when I finally had a very brave black acquaintance say no PEB you are a ignorant racist and you don't even know it. Microaggressions for the loss.

I spent a few more years denying it. Then one day it came to me that yeah ... I have a ton of racist baggage that I don't know how to address. I have spent about 20 years since then reading, watching, listening, writing, and speaking and fighting it out with my stupidity and when I could talk to people about it.

Some of the needle moved from my intellectual efforts, but I'm still so nervous around black people that I'm scared of doing some microaggression and pushing someone into beating the shit out of me that I act super too nice which is just another fucking microaggression.

And then when I'm hurt or vulnerable it all falls apart and all my efforts fail and I end up experiencing feelings of racism yet again.

I hate it about me. But yeah if me this dipshit leftist can struggle to come to understand that I am still racist ... I don't know. I'm pretty dumb so I see myself as below average intelligence with a big mouth.

But maybe everyone else here has this figured out, and Kagan is writing to me specifically about the stupid racism.

I don't think so, but maybe.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

I mean that's the thing to do, be continually (not constantly, that's too often and too stressful) reevaluating your intentional thoughts and actions and seeing where you can do better.

[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 1 points 51 minutes ago* (last edited 50 minutes ago)

so youre saying youre... Afraid for your safety around black people because you got beaten up for something you said at some point? That doesnt sound like self awareness or a micro aggression, that sounds like trauma from catching the wrong person on the wrong day

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Martin Luther King ended racism by having a dream, everybody knows that.

/s

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 39 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but we know corruption exists and should go after anyone holding public office at any level who's taking bribes from billionaires.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Justice Thomas taking vribes from Harlan Crow for example.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 27 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

These justices need to go, and all of their decisions should be thrown out.

I agree with you on that, deport their asses or kill them!

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

They aren't supreme Court justices anymore. When you stop doing your fucking job you lose the title.

They're just publicly owned plinking targets. Nothing more. Your taxes pay for them, your mandate gives them power. You own them, like your car, or your shoes, or your body. It's entirely your choice what you do with them. Once this concept gets large scale introduction to the American people, it WILL gain traction, because it's the ultimate truth. Killing a political appointee, in particular should be considered destruction of public property (larceny) at best.

Appointees in general should be stripped of the right to own property and capped at $100k in liquid assets. While serving all expenses will be paid capped at $400 dollars(not including lodging/travel