this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
54 points (100.0% liked)

electoralism

22272 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/61072

Melat Kiros, a 29-year-old democratic socialist and first-time candidate, defeated 15-term incumbent Rep. Diana DeGette on Tuesday in Colorado's 1st Congressional District primary, the latest signal that progressive momentum and backlash against the Democratic establishment are spreading nationwide.

"We won tonight, but this is also something so much bigger than this moment," Kiros, who was fired from the law firm Sidley Austin in 2023 for speaking out in support of Palestinian rights demonstrators, told backers late Tuesday after The Associated Press called the race in her favor. "We believe that fundamental change can, and will, happen if we fight for it—if we organize, if we show no fear in standing up for what’s right. That is the message that Denver has sent to both parties, to Donald Trump, and to the entire country."

Kiros' upset win came a week after a series of progressive victories in New York congressional primaries, which sparked backlash from the party's corporate wing. Days after the New York contests, more than a dozen centrist Democrats signed an open letter declaring that "we are capitalist, not socialist," a clear rebuke of insurgent progressives.

Justice Democrats, a national progressive group that backed Kiros, said it is having its "most successful cycle to date, winning six Democratic primaries and proceeding to the top two in two California primaries." The organization recruited Darializa Avila Chevalier, who upset five-term incumbent Rep. Adriano Espaillat in New York's 13th Congressional District last week.

"Melat and our candidates continue winning this cycle because Democratic voters are finally getting leaders acting on their demands to bring the fight to the corporations raising our prices, the war lobbies profiting off endless war and genocide, and the immigration gestapo terrorizing our communities," Alexandra Rojas, Justice Democrats' executive director, said in a statement Tuesday.

Kiros—whose platform includes Medicare for All, universal childcare, and abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement—prevailed despite a last-minute torrent of super PAC spending in support of DeGette. Drop Site reported that "super PACs funded by AIPAC and major big tech donors have poured roughly $2 million behind Rep. Diana DeGette on the eve of her contentious primary."

"Across the country, voters are rejecting corporate politics and electing candidates willing to take on billionaire influence, confront the climate crisis, fight for working people, and speak with moral clarity on the defining issues of the moment," said the youth-led Sunrise Movement following Kiros' win.

Kiros will be the heavy favorite to win the general election in November, when she will face Republican Christy Peterson.

Progressives also celebrated Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser's Democratic gubernatorial primary win over US Sen. Michael Bennet, whose campaign received nearly $3 million in support from billionaire former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

“This movement is what democracy looks like,” Weiser told supporters late Tuesday. “You all sent a very clear message: The future of Colorado will not be decided by out-of-state billionaires, by corporations or special interests. Colorado’s future belongs to all of us."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheModerateTankie@hexbear.net 45 points 5 days ago

Demsocs: "Life doesn't have to be shitty! We can use the government to help people who aren't rich!"

Centrists: hillary-apartment "...call the police"

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Sweet vindication, the electoral strategy is bearing fruit after fruit

[–] gayspacemarxist@hexbear.net 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I don't think is a winning strategy, but it is a necessary step for putting pressure on the establishment and gaining popular support for socialism. Like at a certain point, both fascist wings will form a unified front to preserve capitalism that electoral politics isn't equipped to confront.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Depends on what you mean by "winning," bringing about socialism in the United States? Absolutely not, anyone who thinks that is delusional

But setting the stage and checking all the prerequisites that allow for conditions where class organizing can flourish? Yes, that is possible if these victories continue

Like at a certain point, both fascist wings will form a unified front to preserve capitalism that electoral politics isn't equipped to confront.

Bringing about that battle and crisis is the point, but that will only come about when socialists possess a base of support among the working class and the capacity to wield state power

[–] TommyCatkins@hexbear.net 9 points 5 days ago

Even Lenin said that parliaments are where communists need to get a foothold in Western countries. Organizing workers and advocating for them in parliament/Congress allows them to see who their true enemies are. It's where leaders can cut their teeth and the vanguard can judge who is able and willing to lead the revolution. Electoralism isn't the path forward, but it is an important tool/stepping stone.

The German “Lefts” complain of bad “leaders” in their party, give way to despair, and even arrive at a ridiculous “negation” of “leaders”. But in conditions in which it is often necessary to hide “leaders” underground, the evolution of good “leaders”, reliable, tested and authoritative, is a very difficult matter; these difficulties cannot be successfully overcome without combining legal and illegal work, and without testing the “leaders”, among other ways, in parliaments. Criticism—the most keen, ruthless and uncompromising criticism—should be directed, not against parliamentarianism or parliamentary activities, but against those leaders who are unable—and still more against those who are unwilling—to utilise parliamentary elections and the parliamentary rostrum in a revolutionary and communist manner.

So we should support those seeking office to actually advocate for the proletariat over the bourgeois liberals. Zionism is the lever we have in that regard right now as the American public is almost universally opposed to Israel at this point, and the DSA is the most organized left-adjacent political group speaking out. These primary wins aren't going to cause change in the short term, but it is momentum that can be built on.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago

Agreed, electoralism is supplementary and should by no means be discouraged.

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean a win is a win and I'll take it (chuds and liberals seething etc), but i'd like to see something tangible before I describe it as "fruitful" personally. Mamdani has gotten the ball rolling, but so has work ahead. I think that as an executive he has an easier path to tangible outcomes than as a legislator. Even those outcomes have come with obvious compromises.

I do like to see these positions entering a firm position of mainstream acceptability. It is going to be important for the new DSAers to remission principled AND win again. Even then they are "dressing up" their foreign policy in social democratic terms (necessary for them to enter "the machine", which is the whole point). Anyway, still hoping for the best, but just saying the worst is not out of the question until the Left (DSA etc) fractures the Democratic Party.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

but i'd like to see something tangible before I describe it as "fruitful" personally

Like a two-year rent freeze in the largest city in America? All that's left now in terms of proof of concept/demonstration is a foreign policy win, and considering the anti-zionism is intensifying rather getting watered down, I think we'll see it, especially when the Senate victories (like Michigan) become real

[–] da_gay_pussy_eatah@hexbear.net 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The year is 1914. The social democrats have made tremendous gains and hold many seats in parliament. Socialism within the most advanced capitalist nation is around the corner. All they have left to do is to take a firm, principled stand against imperialism, and then the correctness of the reformist strategy will be proven once and for all.

The year is 2026...

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Exactly, the year is 2026, , the US isn't a parliamentary system, and thanks to technology, the bloodiness of imperialism is seared into the minds of the populace (who also aren't all hyper-Catholic/Lutheran white Germans with agrarian social politics)

Note none of that means the DSA will bring about socialism, only that it COULD set the conditions that allow class struggle and organizing to flourish; the real struggle hasn't remotely begun, only the preparations for it

[–] da_gay_pussy_eatah@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago

Famously, class struggle can only flourish when there is a sufficient representation of the working class in political office. That's why historically, revolutions have never taken place under regimes with intense political repression.

[–] TommyCatkins@hexbear.net 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The conclusion which follows from this is absolutely incontrovertible: it has been proved that, far from causing harm to the revolutionary proletariat, participation in a bourgeois-democratic parliament, even a few weeks before the victory of a Soviet republic and even after such a victory, actually helps that proletariat to prove to the backward masses why such parliaments deserve to be done away with; it facilitates their successful dissolution, and helps to make bourgeois parliamentarianism “politically obsolete”. To ignore this experience, while at the same time claiming affiliation to the Communist International, which must work out its tactics internationally (not as narrow or exclusively national tactics, but as international tactics), means committing a gross error and actually abandoning internationalism in deed, while recognising it in word.

Even Lenin said we still need to participate in elections even if for no other reason than to show that the ruling class want to make sure that working people stay oppressed. Most Americans understand that the Democrats have no interest in helping the working masses, and inherently understand the failings of liberalism even if they don't understand why. Pushing for the most popular DSA points like Medicare for all, affordable housing, and fair wages at the very least lays a viable alternative to liberalism. I have no doubt that the DNC will do everything it can to prevent DSA candidates from achieving anything, but that still helps the cause by pushing more people towards the revolution. It is still a useful tool when combined with action outside the legal system.

[–] da_gay_pussy_eatah@hexbear.net 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I never said otherwise. I just thought that phrasing this part

All that's left now in terms of proof of concept/demonstration is a foreign policy win

as a sort of inevitability was hilariously on-the-nose given the history of reformists infamously failing to do exactly that, even in circumstances where their representation in political office were objectively far more extensive than anything DSA-adjacent Democrats have managed.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 0 points 4 days ago

I didn't imply it was inevitable; I explicitly said it was simply the next necessary step to demonstrate that this is a viable path forward, considering current conditions

And I followed it up with reasons that MAY act as drivers that COULD see it happening successfully: "anti-zionism is intensifying" and "Senate victories (like Michigan)" that is not me time traveling to the 1910s, picking up the nearest Kausty pamphlet, and claiming socialism will be birthed by reform

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 5 points 5 days ago

Two year rent freeze is great, happy to tally it up. I expect more because I've tallied a couple L's as well. Plenty of time on the clock though, and I'm optimistic.