this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
124 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

86074 readers
3039 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 80 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tl;dr: Meta has to use Gemini, because their own AI can't keep up. And then Google cut off their access.

In yet another sign that his company is seriously struggling to keep up in the AI race, Google informed Meta earlier this year that it was cutting Meta off from the Gemini AI capacity it needed, the Financial Times reports.

Ironically, the lack of access to Gemini — which is far superior to anything Meta has built in-house — slowed down Meta’s own AI projects, including data moderation and customer services, highlighting how heavily Zuckerberg’s company is leaning on its competitors as its own AI efforts languish.

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 30 points 1 day ago

Gemini was supposed to be catching scammers for them.
But when caught, meta only charged them more, it didn’t delete the accounts.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Robots can feel humiliated?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. Applying human emotions, traits, or intentions to non-human entities is called anthropomorphism.
It is rarely done regarding Zuckerberg, because he has very few aspects to anthropomorphize on.
But it makes the story more intersting when they can.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropomorphism

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

The more you know... 👍

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

At least Marvin could.

[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I legit believe you. There is literally no story about him that could ever come out and surprise me, unless it was a tale of genuine humanity and conscience.

Behind the human siding, there is definitely a certain unknown about him that can only be described as "not right." Whatever was dark in him to start with, his riches and privilege have only magnified.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Got rather badly humiliated yet again. And long may it continue.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The revelation is bound to sting. Despite committing over half a trillion dollars over the next two years, the company’s flailing AI efforts have been plagued by rock bottom morale, infighting, high-level executive departures, and related PR crises.

No wonder everything is shit, when Zuckerberg was convinced that building a big enough LLM he would achieve strong AI! 🤣 🤣
AFAIK Meta had some of the biggest investments just a couple of years ago in AI on that basis! 🤥 🤡

Ah well, Zuckerberg may be stupid, but he will not suffer much, Facebook is still a money machine, and META can afford the losses, just as they could afford the losses on the Metaverse.

It's worse for OpenAI, Palantir and SpaceX with XAI, because they don't have a money machine to save them when the AI business fails.

Google, Microsoft and Meta (facebook) will be OK.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm confused, why is Google telling customers they can't use it's AI? Can they not keep up with demand?

That seems way more interesting a story than Meta relying on a competitor.

[–] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 hours ago

It's likely they were scraping the gemini output to train their own models, which gives very "we have gemini at home" vibes, and I don't have any sympathy for Google when they also stole their training data from everyone. But you can see why they don't want to help Fb with that.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i kinda feel sorry for Yann LeCun and his team at FAI. he’s been saying from the beginning that LLMs are not the way forward for AI research as a field, and that has kept Meta from competing in this gold rush effectively. world models, multi-modality, etc are fine and good research but aren’t here to compete with Claude Code or even as effective at being good enough for stuff like search.

not to be too reductionist, but it’s a tough spot when your head of AI is insisting that this tech has no future when there is a literal $T market for it.

the irony is that these “frontier labs” like OpenAI and Anthropic have basically dropped every greenfield research project that doesn’t directly support their “agentic AI” infrastructure (ie endless Markdown prompts + a while loop) while the labs working on the true frontier are seen as failures because they can’t make a bazillion bucks burning megawatts of energy to replace their front end devs.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

None of the frontier labs are making a bazillion bucks, nor do any of them even have a path to profitability without substantial breakthroughs in the research space.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

i mean, people are making money. sure there are debts owed, but Mark isn’t going home to a 1br rental even after being so “humiliated”. the bag holders are the investors.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

when there is a literal $T market for it.

Is there really?

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah, i know the argument you’re trying to make, but that doesn’t change the actual capital and labor being used to create these things. whether it’s profitable once the investors run out of money is another story.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I see what you mean, but I'm still not sure I would describe that as a "market."

Usually a market has both buyers and sellers.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

yeah, i mean it’s all bit abstract, but that’s essentially what it is.

a concrete example would be Nvidia. they’re wildly profitable, and they don’t care how overleveraged you are as long as their barrels full of cash keep coming in.

i agree with you that there is a concerning amount of debt and leverage going on, but it’s undeniable there’s money changing hands.

but also, speaking of abstract, all this shit is made up and most of the money “moving” is just flipping some bits in a database somewhere. i also agree with you that it’s all a bit of a facade for people with power to play with power while the true “value” of society such as cost of living and quality of life take a low priority cuz “AI has a $T valuation”. but if you live in this system, this is what it is.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This seems to be a tech corp script. Have one good thing, get rich, spend the next few decades failing at everything else you try.

At some point you just have to admit you're really shit at stuff but just got lucky once. The odds will land on someone and that's about as special as you are.

[–] Benaaasaaas@group.lt 1 points 1 day ago

That's how they get their initial business, that's how they are finding the subsequent ones, just throwing spaghetti at the wall until something sticks

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm sure Cuckerborg was reeeeal humiliated

[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 2 points 22 hours ago

The article is so weirdly insistent about Zuckerberg being personally humiliated. How me might feel doesn't really seem to be the interesting thing about the story, but it's all "Zuckerberg BTFO! Zuckerberg on suicide watch!" font and center.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The Epstein class aren't capable of that emotion. They can feel anger when they don't get their way and pleasure at harming others and that's about it.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Google: “cant help you bro, we’re busy shoving that shit into everything we have even though nobody wants it.”

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Mark Cuckerberg

[–] beep@piefed.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The actual title: Google caps Meta’s Gemini use as AI demand strains capacity.

Down-voted due to bad source(Futurism) and bad title.

[–] TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What are you talking about. The articles title is literally "Mark Zuckerberg Just Got Rather Badly Humiliated".

With a rather humorous "That's gonna leave a Mark." for the subtitle.

Your acting like OP made the headline up.

[–] beep@piefed.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cool beans. We're talking about the article OP posted.

[–] beep@piefed.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The article that he posted have bad title and is written by bad news outlet(Futurism),IMO.

[–] TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] beep@piefed.world -2 points 22 hours ago

No, I am Beep.