this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
321 points (99.4% liked)

politics

30493 readers
2067 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement has made yet another arrest at a New York City immigration court, despite a May ruling from a federal judge that broadly blocked such detentions.

U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel, a George W. Bush appointee, ruled May 18 that ICE never had the legal justification to make these arrests. His order, which applied to immigration courts in Manhattan, kneecapped the agency’s controversial strategy of detaining people as they arrived for mandatory immigration hearings.

Despite that, ICE has made at least six arrests in Manhattan immigration courts since Castel issued his order. The latest arrest came on Thursday, when agents detained Bronx resident Matar Ndiaye while he was “dutifully attending an immigration court hearing for his asylum claim,” according to court filings.

Contempt charges?

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And what's going to be done about it?

[–] MrRandom@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

wasn't the police supposed to arrest those ICE agents? but can they arrest themselves?

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Maybe someone will set another building on fire.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 104 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Police providing security at the courts should be arresting those ice agents for kidnapping since they don't have jurisdiction, but we all know why they don't.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

I'm not holding my breath for the ethics of the NYPD

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder what it feels to work so hard thru the police academy and under so much accountability, but then become subservient to a bunch of ex-bounty hunters with 2 weeks training and no accountability.

I'd be pissed off if I was a policeman.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

It feels good when what you want as a police man is stifled by "accountability", but you get to see the ice agents doing it with impunity. They're not pissed, they talk about how awesome it is in the locker room.

[–] cooltrainer_frank@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Some of those that work forces

[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 days ago

It's not called a police state for nothing.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago

Try telling the gestapo that they don't have authority.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they did that, they'd be charged with terrorism or something and get 100 years in the slammer.

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We need to stop making up “if they did” scenarios and just do it. Appeasement has never made anything better against fascists.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was just describing why the fuzz don't touch ICE officers. I wasn't advocating anything.

[–] Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

I am, arm yourselves and trim those fuses shorter.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -3 points 2 days ago
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hmm, an unaccountable paramilitary force that flouts the law without consequences? It's getting really really fascist in this motherfucker.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

And people are still doing nothing about it, and no, protests are not doing something about it

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

What do you want to be done? The smart but feels bad move is to keep taking notes and keep taking names. The regime won't last forever and a blue wave is already coming.

For now, the thing being done will be more court fights between state and federal (aka notekeeping).

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

Just like in Germany in the 30s.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why call them arrests? These are kidnappings.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wonder what Mamdani has to say about this? Or if he can/will do anything about it?

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

He's brown, so if he makes too much of a stink NYPD will fire several warning shots into his back while he's "aggressively" tying a shoe.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Honestly, given how he capitulated to the NYPD, I’d imagine he can’t do much. I somehow doubt he would be allowed.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do you mean by this? First I’m hearing of it

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He'd campaigned on reining in the NYPD, but as soon as he was elected he specifically started praising them and hasn't done anything to curb some of the... well, more problematic elements. It is assumed that they threatened him or something, because him doing nothing about them goes against his supposed worldview and what he campaigned on. It's very well possible that the realities of being in office or just that his ability to affect things as Mayor isn't as powerful or robust as he'd thought. In any case, it's one of the few elements of his campaign he's gone back on.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hard to say. Mamdami has a lot of work to do and reforming the NYPD during these times is one of the larger tasks. That might be more for something during his 2nd term if he gets that far.

But I wouldn't be surprised if he got a lot of flak internally over these issues once he got in.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah, I agree. I think it’s dumb to expect everything to get better overnight. The fact that he’s done as much as he has is amazing.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Most people have no choice but to capitulate to an organized and armed force, regardless of station in life.

It's an important lesson. One the working class should take to heart.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is all theater. The courts will hem and haw about rights and rule of law but ultimately wont do jack shit all to cement the SS...sorry ICEs position above the law and ability to take who ever when ever they want from where ever.

You're not wrong. The court was complicit as they can declare the "arrests" illegal.

Minor correction, these aren't the SS they are the SA. This is why we need to fight now, they're not yet organized enough to be the SS, they're still forming. We still have a chance to create enough political pressure to disband them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

2 years down the line and they'll issue the third final warning to stop doing illegal things, which the appeals court will immediately stay because a few months without optimal inductions into the concentration camps is considered an irreversible harm.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

All the ice agents look like they have pink eye.