this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
122 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

86512 readers
3290 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 20 hours ago

OH NO, NOT FIVE PERCENT OF YOUR LITERAL BILLIONS.

[–] moustachio@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago

Billionaires always eager to provide proof they are complete parasites of society.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The Financial Times reports that the billionaires who left the state last year, seemingly for the express purpose of not having their assets taxed, will more than likely be subject to “an intrusive residency audit to test whether they still have to pay the 5 percent levy” should the ballot measure pass. As the paper notes, “California has a history of aggressively pursuing individuals it claims are still resident for tax purposes” and is absolutely not going to just accept a house deed as proof. Instead, an investigation “can involve checking ownership of property and where a taxpayer’s children are enrolled in school, but also where their cars are registered, where they have a doctor, vet and bank accounts, and whether they left items of sentimental value in California,” and the California’s Franchise Tax Board examines if a taxpayer “substantially severed his California connections upon his departure or whether he maintained his California connections in readiness for his return,” per its handbook.

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 8 points 18 hours ago

"So which one of your 30 houses do you spend the most time at? Is it one of the 5 in California?"

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 12 points 18 hours ago

TBH, it makes perfect sense. If you don't want to be subject to the laws of California (or whatever state/city/country), you need to genuinely not be there. This is true as a resident or a business.

It doesn't surprise me at all that people want the benefits of living in California without the obligations.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This feels like it belongs more in Late Stage Capitalism than Technology. (Crossposted it.)

But yes, kick the billionaires in the dick. A wealth tax is essential.

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 3 points 18 hours ago

Hunt them to the ends of the earth.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 4 points 21 hours ago