this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
264 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

86589 readers
3276 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DrPop@lemmy.world 37 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This shouldn't even be up for debate.

[–] mereo@piefed.ca 10 points 5 hours ago

And the fact that it is a debate tell you everything about the state of the world today... sigh

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 32 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

They could solve this problem and a bunch of others by banning the surveillance and collection of user data without consent.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Can't help but imagine this would result in having to "read" and sign a 70 page ToS and 30 page Privacy Policy before we can buy groceries.

[–] Jack@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

How dare you question the orphan-crushing economy!

This comment sponsored by Torment Nexus Inc.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

More perfect union did a few stories about this. Beware the bill that looks like it helps but secretly opens the door to doing the same thing. Basically, don't believe what you see until someone you trust says it will actually help.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 5 hours ago

Don't trust it until lawyers have had months to examine the exact wording. Loopholes are to easy to hide. Often a other wise good bill will have something awful in it such that you must oppose the whole

[–] cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au 6 points 6 hours ago

The fact they're trying is still a problem.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I would die for my country, New Jersey

[–] abrake@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Bruce Springsteen and Bon Jovi would pour a drink out in your honor

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

Yet another common NJ W.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

For those not in NJ trying to avoid this, pay in cash and punch in a random phone number at the register.

You may need to try a few numbers at self-checkout to find a working one, but it's surprisingly easy. Rotate the numbers to dirty up the data of these parasites.

[–] runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

just use Jenny's number. Guaranteed* to work in all 50 states and the district of Columbia.

*this is a lie.

[–] rollin@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

er what? Are you saying people in US have to enter their phone number every time they buy stuff??

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"loyalty cards" are common. stores (and each of their 369354764 data sharing "partners") get to track everything you buy and when. in exchange, you get token "discounts" on a small selection of products. some stores have done away with the actual physical cards, and use mobile phone apps or just the mobile phone number to track you.

[–] rollin@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

ah got you, thanks for the explanation